git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Yuki Kokubun <orga.chem.job@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] filter-branch: consider refs can refer to an object other than commit or tag
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 14:26:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ab3bd79.d14d650a.be5c0.8544@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqpo3xnqq4.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>

> Yuki Kokubun <orga.chem.job@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> >> Yuki Kokubun <orga.chem.job@gmail.com> writes:
> >> 
> >> > "git filter-branch -- --all" can be confused when refs that refer to objects
> >> > other than commits or tags exists.
> >> > Because "git rev-parse --all" that is internally used can return refs that
> >> > refer to an object other than commit or tag. But it is not considered in the
> >> > phase of updating refs.
> >> 
> >> Could you describe what the consequence of that is?  We have a ref
> >> that points directly at a blob object, or a ref that points at a tag
> >> object that points at a blob object.  The current code leaves both of
> >> these refs in "$tempdir/heads".  Then...?
> >
> > Sorry, this is my wrong.
> > I wrongly thought only refs/replace can point at a blob or tree object.
> 
> No need to be sorry.  You still need to describe what (bad things)
> happen if we do not filter out refs that do not point at committish
> in the proposed log message.  
> 
> IOW, can you elaborate and clarify your "can be confused" at the
> beginning?

I meant the confusion is abnormal messages from the output of "git filter-branch -- --all".
For example, this is an output of "git filter-branch -- --all":

Rewrite bcdbd016c77df3d5641a3cf820b2ed46ba7bf3b4 (5/5) (0 seconds passed, remaining 0 predicted)
WARNING: Ref 'refs/heads/master' is unchanged
WARNING: Ref 'refs/heads/no-newline' is unchanged
WARNING: Ref 'refs/heads/original' is unchanged
error: object 1bf53b49c26465454e4ac377f2ed3f91bb1d6ac1 is a tree, not a commit
error: object 1bf53b49c26465454e4ac377f2ed3f91bb1d6ac1 is a tree, not a commit
fatal: ambiguous argument 'refs/replace/8a2016f3730cad8309c110f819c855403ed0a5b9^0': unknown revision or path not in the working tree.
Use '--' to separate paths from revisions, like this:
'git <command> [<revision>...] -- [<file>...]'
WARNING: Ref 'refs/replace/8a2016f3730cad8309c110f819c855403ed0a5b9' is unchanged
WARNING: Ref 'refs/tags/add-file' is unchanged
WARNING: Ref 'refs/tags/file' is unchanged
error: object 1bf53b49c26465454e4ac377f2ed3f91bb1d6ac1 is a tree, not a commit
error: object 1bf53b49c26465454e4ac377f2ed3f91bb1d6ac1 is a tree, not a commit
fatal: ambiguous argument 'refs/tags/treetag^0': unknown revision or path not in the working tree.
Use '--' to separate paths from revisions, like this:
'git <command> [<revision>...] -- [<file>...]'
WARNING: Ref 'refs/tags/treetag' is unchanged

You can see a lot of terrible messages such as "error" and "fatal".
But on the whole, the result of "git filter-branch -- --all" is not so abnormal.
So, this is a just problem about abonormal messages.

I think this messages should be suppressed.
How do you feel about it?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-03-22 14:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-21 10:35 [PATCH] filter-branch: consider refs/replace can refer to an object other than commit Yuki Kokubun
2018-03-21 15:31 ` [PATCH] filter-branch: consider refs can refer to an object other than commit or tag Yuki Kokubun
2018-03-21 17:21   ` Junio C Hamano
2018-03-21 20:00   ` Yuki Kokubun
2018-03-21 20:00     ` Junio C Hamano
2018-03-22 14:26     ` Yuki Kokubun [this message]
2018-03-22 17:01       ` Junio C Hamano
2018-03-23  2:15       ` Yuki Kokubun
2018-03-23  5:09         ` [PATCH v2] filter-branch: fix errors caused by refs that cannot be used with ^0 Yuki Kokubun
2018-03-23 20:20           ` Junio C Hamano
2018-03-24 19:41             ` [PATCH v3] filter-branch: fix errors caused by refs that point at non-committish Yuki Kokubun
2018-03-25 16:25               ` Junio C Hamano
2018-03-25 16:39                 ` Yuki Kokubun
2018-03-25 20:24                   ` Junio C Hamano
2018-03-25 16:54                 ` [PATCH v4] " Yuki Kokubun
2018-03-25 16:45                   ` Yuki Kokubun
2018-04-08 23:10                     ` Junio C Hamano
2018-03-25 17:01                   ` [PATCH v5] " Yuki Kokubun
2018-03-25 17:13                   ` [PATCH v4] " Junio C Hamano
2018-03-24 19:29           ` [PATCH] filter-branch: consider refs can refer to an object other than commit or tag Yuki Kokubun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5ab3bd79.d14d650a.be5c0.8544@mx.google.com \
    --to=orga.chem.job@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).