From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wincent Colaiuta Subject: Re: Workflow question Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:37:10 +0200 Message-ID: <5E384CBB-4562-47B3-B4D8-D12D5A5129D6@wincent.com> References: <46F93A99.5080707@gmail.com> <46F95CCC.4080209@op5.se> <20070925193416.GB8564@coredump.intra.peff.net> <24DF51B9-1BF9-40C0-A1EF-80EF5072570F@wincent.com> <20070925202022.GC19549@segfault.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Andreas Ericsson , Russ Brown , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Sep 25 22:37:35 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IaH9v-0006H8-0G for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:37:31 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752060AbXIYUhW convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:37:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752044AbXIYUhW (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:37:22 -0400 Received: from wincent.com ([72.3.236.74]:42346 "EHLO s69819.wincent.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752041AbXIYUhV convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:37:21 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.129] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by s69819.wincent.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l8PKbCbH004644; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 15:37:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20070925202022.GC19549@segfault.peff.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: El 25/9/2007, a las 22:20, Jeff King escribi=F3: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 09:50:34PM +0200, Wincent Colaiuta wrote: > >> Google has a pretty interesting internal code review system: >> >> > > Interesting pointer, thanks. Though I did get a little concerned =20 > when I > saw that it is based on Perforce. ;) Yes (poor Google employees!), and not only that, I'm not aware of any =20 public access to the code. But still, there are some interesting =20 ideas about the review process in there. W