From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=FCdiger?= Sonderfeld Subject: Re: Sending patches with KMail (Re: [PATCH] git-blame.el: Fix compilation warnings.) Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 20:18:08 +0100 Message-ID: <5720118.t52aoWEQJn@descartes> References: <2608010.fNV39qBMLu@descartes> <20120113233158.GD7343@burratino> <7vlipbxfne.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Jonathan Nieder , git@vger.kernel.org, davidk@lysator.liu.se, Sergei Organov , Kevin Ryde , Michele Ballabio To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jan 14 20:18:34 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rm97X-00030T-N7 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 20:18:32 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755938Ab2ANTSY convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jan 2012 14:18:24 -0500 Received: from ptmx.org ([178.63.28.110]:57147 "EHLO ptmx.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754713Ab2ANTSX convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jan 2012 14:18:23 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ptmx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E5BA257FA; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 20:18:17 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at ptmx.org Received: from ptmx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ptmx.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8MyCQoppUe2Q; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 20:18:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from descartes.localnet (213-33-31-7.adsl.highway.telekom.at [213.33.31.7]) by ptmx.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 422E3206BA; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 20:18:13 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: KMail/4.7.3 (Linux/3.0.0-14-generic; KDE/4.7.4; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <7vlipbxfne.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Friday 13 January 2012 16:59:49 Junio C Hamano wrote: > Perhaps rephrasing the early part of the Discussion section, with an > illustration that is designed to be more visible, would be a better > approach? Why not do both? I think you are right, that it is currently not very visible in the Dis= cussion=20 section. But on the other hand if you have a step by step guide it shou= ld=20 probably mention that as well. It has nothing to do with laziness. But = most=20 people follow a step by step guide because they expect that it illustra= tes the=20 correct procedure. Jonathan's addition is short but effective. Regards, R=C3=BCdiger