git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
To: Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com>,
	Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, sunshine@sunshineco.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] git-p4: suppress non test relevant output
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 11:09:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <567BD26F.3020006@diamand.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0185CA76-DDEE-4E7F-8EFF-65E80720E0AF@gmail.com>

On 22/12/15 08:47, Lars Schneider wrote:
>
> On 21 Dec 2015, at 21:38, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>

>>
>> If so, why not do it there instead?  You seem to run only "kill" to
>> send some signal to a process using this helper function, and it
>> would be silent on its standard output stream (even though it may
>> say "no such process" etc. on its standard error), so it is not
>> clear to me what you are doing with this change here...
>
> If I run git-p4 tests in verbose mode (e.g. "./t9823-git-p4-mock-lfs.sh -v") without this patch then the last lines of the output look like this:
>
>>>> Output Start >>>
> expecting success:
> 	kill_p4d
>
> ./lib-git-p4.sh: line 172: 26289 Killed: 9               while true; do
>      if test $(time_in_seconds) -gt $timeout; then
>          kill -9 $pid; exit 1;
>      fi; sleep 1;
> done
> ok 8 - kill p4d
>
> # passed all 8 test(s)
> 1..8
> <<< Output end <<<
>
> However, I want them to look like this:
>
>>>> Output Start >>>
> expecting success:
> 	kill_p4d
>
> ok 8 - kill p4d
>
> # passed all 8 test(s)
> 1..8
> <<< Output end <<<
>
> This is achieved with the patch. I am no shell expert ... is there a nicer way to achieve the same?

I get your desired output with the unmodified code from origin/next:

$ ./t9823-git-p4-mock-lfs.sh -v
expecting success:
	kill_p4d

ok 8 - kill p4d

# passed all 8 test(s)
1..8

But that's because my shell is symlinked to /bin/dash. I suspect you are 
using bash - when I run this with bash I get your command output. 
Possibly a bash bug?

As Junio says, it seems a bit weird that we have to redirect the stderr 
of that entire expression.

Luke

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-24 11:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-20 16:44 [PATCH v1 0/2] git-p4: kill watchdog and suppress irrelevant output larsxschneider
2015-12-20 16:44 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] git-p4: kill p4d watchdog on cleanup larsxschneider
2015-12-20 16:44 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] git-p4: suppress non test relevant output larsxschneider
2015-12-21 20:38   ` Junio C Hamano
2015-12-22  8:47     ` Lars Schneider
2015-12-24 11:09       ` Luke Diamand [this message]
2015-12-21 20:31 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] git-p4: kill watchdog and suppress irrelevant output Junio C Hamano
2015-12-22  9:12   ` Lars Schneider

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=567BD26F.3020006@diamand.org \
    --to=luke@diamand.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=larsxschneider@gmail.com \
    --cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).