From: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Carlo Arenas <carenas@gmail.com>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>,
Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com>,
GIT Mailing-list <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] range-diff: fix some 'hdr-check' and sparse warnings
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2019 10:30:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54c2ee44-ee99-ea4a-3154-f642e0060877@kdbg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190714005129.GA4525@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Am 14.07.19 um 02:51 schrieb Jeff King:
> I wonder if we could come up with a definition of INIT_ZERO such that:
>
> struct foo bar = { INIT_ZERO };
>
> worked everywhere. IMHO that is more readable than "{}" anyway.
Not when = {} becomes a well-established way to express
zero-initialization. At that point, your suggested macro would obfuscate
the construct.
> But it does seem a real shame there is no way to say "zero-initialize
> this struct" in C without providing at least a single member value.
Indeed. For this reason, I'm arguing for the second-best form that
places a 0 between the braces.
> Ordering struct definitions to put an arithmetic type at the start is an
> OK workaround (to just let "0" work everywhere).
Why would you re-order members? There's nothing wrong when a pointer is
initialized by 0.
> But it does fall down
> when the first element _has_ to be a struct (like, say, any user of our
> hashmap.[ch] interface).
No, it does not. It is not necessary to spell out nested structs in the
initializer.
-- Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-14 8:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-11 22:03 [PATCH] range-diff: fix some 'hdr-check' and sparse warnings Ramsay Jones
2019-07-12 5:21 ` Johannes Sixt
2019-07-12 16:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-07-13 10:44 ` Johannes Sixt
2019-07-13 12:18 ` Johannes Sixt
2019-07-13 12:56 ` Carlo Arenas
2019-07-13 21:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-07-13 22:22 ` Carlo Arenas
2019-07-14 0:51 ` Jeff King
2019-07-14 8:30 ` Johannes Sixt [this message]
2019-07-15 14:46 ` Jeff King
2019-07-15 17:30 ` Johannes Sixt
2019-07-15 18:15 ` Jeff King
2019-07-16 19:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-07-16 20:01 ` Jeff King
2019-07-17 18:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-07-17 19:21 ` Jeff King
2019-07-17 20:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-07-17 17:23 ` Johannes Sixt
2019-07-15 14:47 ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-10-02 17:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-10-04 18:35 ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-07-14 8:15 ` Johannes Sixt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54c2ee44-ee99-ea4a-3154-f642e0060877@kdbg.org \
--to=j6t@kdbg.org \
--cc=carenas@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com \
--cc=t.gummerer@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).