From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E28331F403 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 10:54:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=wired4ever.net header.i=sndanailov@wired4ever.net header.b="fkGPSVTf"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229484AbiJMKyj (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Oct 2022 06:54:39 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47838 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229462AbiJMKyh (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Oct 2022 06:54:37 -0400 Received: from wilbur.contactoffice.com (wilbur.contactoffice.com [212.3.242.68]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C91510536A for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 03:54:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpauth1.co-bxl (smtpauth1.co-bxl [10.2.0.15]) by wilbur.contactoffice.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5FEF3413; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 12:54:29 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1665658469; s=20220911-jt8y; d=wired4ever.net; i=sndanailov@wired4ever.net; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:References:Cc:From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; l=684; bh=eHeEzFCxS+ZXnk6RgfzWJzrS6/oWb+Xx1YzDr2XrApU=; b=fkGPSVTf6W/GLzqKnBVUDyZZtrvs5FVu9aci7icDfp5rGk7nfj/poD+E5VNaf6ih oIqFucBuVnVtos0Cxh17km7n6hI2gqGy6lsNH0Vh2/e8dzYkg1sFNeHJhLFse1Sak/N jtc4k+R5kK44UPdRsGj6S1s6TojmLHnALzhOd/iXLkBb3XVBnl6+pQuVb7VZvKgjmVc HhlQR4yCNmEbm0Rm2vOPtCwQk3i30HafuL+UjiZeXBEqbQ0Tj/MdSjurD7uKukN/b6b 7WKrW46Xrm8sM0mseAisEzB3uiBTzFpm6VY9WXq0NpSzynj1PL6xlMkhfY2PM7752dO 6dDp/kunGg== Received: by smtp.mailfence.com with ESMTPSA ; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 12:54:27 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <543353ff-981d-9804-3abb-d29caa8300ba@wired4ever.net> Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 12:54:26 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] docs: git-send-email: difference between ssl and tls smtp-encryption To: Junio C Hamano References: <20221012150619.12877-1-sndanailov@wired4ever.net> Content-Language: en-US Cc: "brian m. carlson" , git@vger.kernel.org, aaron@schrab.com, philipoakley@iee.email From: Sotir Danailov In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ContactOffice-Account: com:378009619 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Wed 12 Oct 2022 23:38, Junio C Hamano wrote: > not because it is common to use randomly numbered ports. Yes, good point! Also I feel the description might become a bit too bloated if we squeeze in the reference. Although I'm not against adding it as well, it will make things a lot clearer for sure. There's also the issue with the commonly found alternative port 587, which I feel might be better fixed by making the script test for it as well if the first default fails. I don't mind making a v4, but from the responses it seems there's no need? Thanks everybody for the input, helping me with the patches and for the fast responses, I really appreciate it!