From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?UmVuw6kgU2NoYXJmZQ==?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] strbuf: export strbuf_addchars() Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 23:36:11 +0200 Message-ID: <540E214B.3060400@web.de> References: <540C0344.9060002@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Git Mailing List To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Sep 08 23:36:41 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XR6c3-0007TR-Pj for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Sep 2014 23:36:40 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754730AbaIHVgf convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Sep 2014 17:36:35 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.12]:60829 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754254AbaIHVgf (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Sep 2014 17:36:35 -0400 Received: from [192.168.178.27] ([79.253.187.29]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LxOHm-1YSYGI0Dus-016zyL; Mon, 08 Sep 2014 23:36:32 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:ye0jlMh18kLC/9GKJQswt/J7n9/q/dbbz+fp+j5Cgq30wTNehcp pc9HN+2ZAOrWn3JIItpyrH0G4raPPBHHNbnyLHsJ80haJM49VK4GgPe16H4Ouzi0uXIFNaH RiJEG6F4WrQMVM2WKZjCx0L7J0FMwJT+aJKWvHjZTjdV5nt9fGcQ1aRC0Ug3GdsqaOUpDmb BkPgra6AnEABSRfD4chSg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Am 08.09.2014 um 20:32 schrieb Junio C Hamano: > Ren=C3=A9 Scharfe writes: > >> Move strbuf_addchars() to strbuf.c, where it belongs, and make it >> available for other callers. >> >> Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe > > Wow, fixing up v1.7.0.2~9^2~2? About time, isn't it? ;) > Both patches look correct, but I have to wonder where you are > drawing these clean-up opportunities from? Almost as if reading > through dormant part of the codebase one of your hobbies or > something ;-) That, and I'm sitting on a pile of cleanup patches that grew whenever I= =20 looked at some piece of code for the first time, e.g. due to bug=20 reports, or when I took a static analyzer for a test drive etc. I'm=20 trying to filter out the good ones and to send them at opportune moment= s=20 in order to avoid conflicts with real changes. Ren=C3=A9