git bug

git bug

[PANEL Christian]

someting is not logical in the behaviour of git :

suppose I have a project and a file in it I don't want to include initially in.
so I put this file name in .gitignore
now all is OK when I write "git status" : the file is ignored.

but later I want this one be a part of my project.
I delete in .gitignore the line that named this file.
but now a "git status" command ignore always this file.

what is wrong ?
did I missed something ?

thanks for any answer 

Re: git bug

[René Scharfe]

Am 06.08.20 um 16:48 schrieb PANEL Christian:
> someting is not logical in the behaviour of git :
>
> suppose I have a project and a file in it I don't want to include initially in.
> so I put this file name in .gitignore
> now all is OK when I write "git status" : the file is ignored.

Like this, right?

  $ git init a
  Initialized empty Git repository in /tmp/a/.git/
  $ cd a
  $ echo ignore for now >file
  $ echo file >.gitignore
  $ git add .gitignore
  $ git commit -m initial
  [master (root-commit) 2df5d68] initial
   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
   create mode 100644 .gitignore
  $ git status
  On branch master
  nothing to commit, working tree clean

> but later I want this one be a part of my project.
> I delete in .gitignore the line that named this file.
> but now a "git status" command ignore always this file.
>
> what is wrong ?
> did I missed something ?

This seems to work as expected for me (continued from above):

  $ >.gitignore
  $ git status
  On branch master
  Changes not staged for commit:
    (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
    (use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
  	modified:   .gitignore

  Untracked files:
    (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
  	file

  no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")

So "file" is no longer ignored.  Committing the .gitignore change
doesn't change that:

  $ git add .gitignore
  $ git commit -m 2nd
  [master d4c95a1] 2nd
   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
  $ git status
  On branch master
  Untracked files:
    (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
  	file

  nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git add" to track)

Which steps did you take to arrive at a different result?

René

Re: git bug

[Jeff King]

On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 10:23:54PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:

> So "file" is no longer ignored.  Committing the .gitignore change
> doesn't change that:
> 
>   $ git add .gitignore
>   $ git commit -m 2nd
>   [master d4c95a1] 2nd
>    1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>   $ git status
>   On branch master
>   Untracked files:
>     (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
>   	file
> 
>   nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git add" to track)
> 
> Which steps did you take to arrive at a different result?

Perhaps also:

  git check-ignore -v file

would be helpful for seeing why Git thinks it might be ignored (e.g.,
another wildcard rule that happens to match it).

-Peff

Re: git bug

[René Scharfe]

Am 07.08.20 um 02:02 schrieb Jeff King:
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 10:23:54PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:
>
>> So "file" is no longer ignored.  Committing the .gitignore change
>> doesn't change that:
>>
>>   $ git add .gitignore
>>   $ git commit -m 2nd
>>   [master d4c95a1] 2nd
>>    1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>   $ git status
>>   On branch master
>>   Untracked files:
>>     (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
>>   	file
>>
>>   nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git add" to track)
>>
>> Which steps did you take to arrive at a different result?
>
> Perhaps also:
>
>   git check-ignore -v file
>
> would be helpful for seeing why Git thinks it might be ignored (e.g.,
> another wildcard rule that happens to match it).

Right.  And there is more than one possible place to specify files to be
ignored.  E.g. you can use info/exclude in your Git directory (i.e.
.git/info/exclude by default) for repository-specific patterns don't
want to share.  See https://git-scm.com/docs/gitignore or the manpage
of gitignore(5) for more details.

René

Re: git bug

[PANEL Christian]

thanks a lot.
It was exactly what I was seaching (and havent' read yet ;) )

best regards

Le lundi 10 août 2020 à 07:56 +0200, René Scharfe a écrit :
> Am 07.08.20 um 02:02 schrieb Jeff King:
> > 
> > On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 10:23:54PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > So "file" is no longer ignored.  Committing the .gitignore change
> > > doesn't change that:
> > > 
> > >   $ git add .gitignore
> > >   $ git commit -m 2nd
> > >   [master d4c95a1] 2nd
> > >    1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> > >   $ git status
> > >   On branch master
> > >   Untracked files:
> > >     (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
> > >   	file
> > > 
> > >   nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git add" to track)
> > > 
> > > Which steps did you take to arrive at a different result?
> > Perhaps also:
> > 
> >   git check-ignore -v file
> > 
> > would be helpful for seeing why Git thinks it might be ignored (e.g.,
> > another wildcard rule that happens to match it).
> Right.  And there is more than one possible place to specify files to be
> ignored.  E.g. you can use info/exclude in your Git directory (i.e.
> .git/info/exclude by default) for repository-specific patterns don't
> want to share.  See https://git-scm.com/docs/gitignore or the manpage
> of gitignore(5) for more details.
> 
> René

git bug

[PANEL Christian]

someting is not logical in the behaviour of git :

suppose I have a project and a file in it I don't want to include initially in.
so I put this file name in .gitignore
now all is OK when I write "git status" : the file is ignored.

but later I want this one be a part of my project.
I delete in .gitignore the line that named this file.
but now a "git status" command ignore always this file.

what is wrong ?
did I missed something ?

thanks for any answer 

git BUG

[Коньков Евгений]

Hi, git

I have get git bug while merging branches.

the farm has branch one year old. say b1
I have develop some feature in this year so I start new branch
  git checkout master
  git checkout -b b2

I get task to develop feature b1. b1 require changes in b2
  git checkout b1
  git merge b2
  git checkout --theirs
  git commit

after some time I need new code from master
  git merge master

after this merge I notice that some code, that was developed in b2, is
disappeared despite on it was merged into b1

so I start to merge it again:
  git merge b2

No results. So I decide to do some testing. I go to b2
  git checkout b2

make changes into file on b2:
diff --git a/lib/SRS/Domain.pm b/lib/SRS/Domain.pm
index 8fa1b1a..23a9429 100644
--- a/lib/SRS/Domain.pm
+++ b/lib/SRS/Domain.pm
@@ -2804,6 +2804,7 @@ sub can_renew_state {
 sub zone {
     my ( $self ) =  @_;

+
     load_class 'SRS::Comm::Zone::Domain';

     return

I have add one empty line to subroutine that have developed in b2.
  git commit
  git checkout b1
  git merge b2

and I get conflict:
+++ b/lib/SRS/Domain.pm
@@@ -2830,24 -2801,20 +2830,29 @@@ sub can_renew_state

  =cut

 -sub zone {
 -    my ( $self ) =  @_;
 +sub can_cancel_transin {
 +    my $self = shift;

++<<<<<<< HEAD
 +    return if $self->{freeze_date};
 +    return unless $self->{create_method} eq 'trans' && $self->{state} eq 'N';
++=======
+
+     load_class 'SRS::Comm::Zone::Domain';
++>>>>>>> yandex_mail_new_api

 -    return
 -        SRS::Comm::Zone::Domain->new(
 -            dname   => $self->{dname},
 -            service => $self,
 -        );
 +    my ( $pos_id ) = dbh_rw->selectrow_array(
 +        'SELECT bi.pos_id FROM billitems bi JOIN bills b ON b.bill_id = bi.bill_id WHERE service_id =
 +        undef,
 +        $self->{service_id}, $self->{user_id}
 +    );
 +
 +    return $pos_id;
  }

 -=back
 +=item cancel_transin
 +
 +Ф-ция отмены переноса

  =cut


As you can see conflict at 'can_cancel_transin' subroutine
but I do changes in 'zone' subroutine


Please help to resolve that CONFLICT and return code from b2 to be
alive again in b1.

And, if you can, please explain why this occur

-- 
 С уважением,
 Коньков Евгений
 Программист
 Регистратор доменных имен REG.RU
 Телефон: +38 (097) 7654-676
 www.reg.ru
 ___________________
 Sincerely yours,
 Konkov Eugen
 Developer
 Accredited domain Registrar REG.RU, LLC.
 Phone: +38 (097) 7654-676
 www.reg.ru/en/

mailto:kes@reg.ru