From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felipe Contreras Subject: RE: GSoC 2014: Summary so far, discussion starter: how to improve? Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 07:00:44 -0500 Message-ID: <5262746ce10dc_4e9f1021e84b7@nysa.notmuch> References: <8761stx04i.fsf@linux-k42r.v.cablecom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ben Straub , =?UTF-8?B?Q2FybG9zIE1hcnTDrW4gTmlldG8=?= , Christian Couder , David Michael Barr , Edward Thomson , Florian Achleitner , Jakub Narebski , Jeff King , Jens Lehmann , Martin Woodward , Matthieu Moy , Michael Haggerty , Michael Schubert , Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy , Pat Thoyts , Paul Mackerras , Philip Kelley , Ramkumar Ramachandra , Ramsay Jones , Russell Belfer , Scott Chacon , Shawn Pearce , Thomas To: Thomas Rast , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Oct 19 14:10:56 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VXVMl-0006BN-GH for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 14:10:47 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751812Ab3JSMK3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Oct 2013 08:10:29 -0400 Received: from mail-oa0-f52.google.com ([209.85.219.52]:51826 "EHLO mail-oa0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751361Ab3JSMK2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Oct 2013 08:10:28 -0400 Received: by mail-oa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id n10so1423815oag.39 for ; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 05:10:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ow4A+kbxBkvxc7gkh8uj/MT2rVSiMUMqLWq02ifozmg=; b=HdQSJ15o98jbxHO7+4g3VR5oIgOZhz27TddH+iRgSe/Y04qQCFpEGNV5TbKiNbp0Ip POvOw36hYCqOMsMeHCm3pDAQTHcVRFHPi84frJe1f2Pjf3+lDgZqxUi5Z19vh+FzBfsg aoTqFdGlCq7zkOn0AP5HCKKxj8t1q+oizhC+vzInelbNda10TZ6c7v6qoDgUGgLIl7CY 4rGqnBsvl1JjV6YjrHot9FK/a1d+0c7vfkAFe2ylOKxciueQJVCyGtKDcs4JqiondWC7 D1UAta/BVZro/6WLIFxe0pjUZJcZIMi5lxKQOnCqPDjXVBlVg1P/k3orW1cppII1ZZr9 mh/A== X-Received: by 10.182.220.225 with SMTP id pz1mr9336072obc.51.1382184626282; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 05:10:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (187-162-140-241.static.axtel.net. [187.162.140.241]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id tz10sm15010604obc.10.2013.10.19.05.10.22 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 19 Oct 2013 05:10:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8761stx04i.fsf@linux-k42r.v.cablecom.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Thomas Rast wrote: > * Diminishing returns: Git is too mature, with little low-hanging > fruit left, making such projects harder Too mature? Aren't there other projects that are "too mature" as well? In particular I'm thinking about the Linux kernel. I think it's not about maturity, but how they deal with change. > * Does libgit2 want to remain under the Git umbrella, or participate > on its own? Personally I don't see what libgit2 has to do with git.git. There isn't even communication between the two projects. -- Felipe Contreras