From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Branchaud Subject: Re: Local tag killer Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 08:45:57 -0400 Message-ID: <524AC405.3040209@xiplink.com> References: <52327E62.2040301@alum.mit.edu> <523D3FD2.4090002@alum.mit.edu> <20130924075119.GD7257@sigill.intra.peff.net> <5246C975.1050504@alum.mit.edu> <5247ACB9.40208@alum.mit.edu> <52499797.9030100@xiplink.com> <5249CDF7.4050904@xiplink.com> <5249E9C8.1070700@xiplink.com> <524A3BB6.9060808@xiplink.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Michael Haggerty , Johan Herland , Jeff King , Junio C Hamano , Git mailing list , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Carlos_Mart=EDn_Nieto?= , Michael Schubert To: Nicolas Pitre X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Oct 01 14:51:41 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VQzQR-0001nN-UU for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 14:51:40 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753376Ab3JAMvd (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Oct 2013 08:51:33 -0400 Received: from smtp146.ord.emailsrvr.com ([173.203.6.146]:57152 "EHLO smtp146.ord.emailsrvr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753357Ab3JAMvb (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Oct 2013 08:51:31 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 331 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 08:51:31 EDT Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp27.relay.ord1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 031DF2A813F; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 08:45:59 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp27.relay.ord1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: mbranchaud-AT-xiplink.com) with ESMTPSA id A26FD2A8443; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 08:45:58 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 13-09-30 11:28 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > But with my proposal, you'd get a message saying that the tag "baz" is > ambigous, and that you'd have to use either "libfoo/baz" or > "libbar/baz". Yes, and that's good. I agree with your proposal. Sorry if that wasn't clear. M.