From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk>
To: Mark Levedahl <mlevedahl@gmail.com>
Cc: mhagger@alum.mit.edu, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>, Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>,
"Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>,
tboegi@web.de, dpotapov@gmail.com,
GIT Mailing-list <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 1/1] cygwin: Add fast_lstat() and fast_fstat() functions
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 22:36:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E5BCDF.5070004@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51E2CE97.2040900@gmail.com>
Mark Levedahl wrote:
> On 07/10/2013 04:23 PM, Ramsay Jones wrote:
>> Commit adbc0b6b ("cygwin: Use native Win32 API for stat", 30-09-2008)
>> added a Win32 specific implementation of the stat functions. In order
>> to handle absolute paths, cygwin mount points and symbolic links, this
>> implementation may fall back on the standard cygwin l/stat() functions.
>> Also, the choice of cygwin or Win32 functions is made lazily (by the
>> first call(s) to l/stat) based on the state of some config variables.
>>
>> Unfortunately, this "schizophrenic stat" implementation has been the
>> source of many problems ever since. For example, see commits 7faee6b8,
>> 79748439, 452993c2, 085479e7, b8a97333, 924aaf3e, 05bab3ea and 0117c2f0.
>>
>> In order to limit the adverse effects caused by this implementation,
>> we provide a new "fast stat" interface, which allows us to use this
>> only for interactions with the index (i.e. the cached stat data).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk>
>> ---
>
> I've tested this on Cygwin 1.7 on WIndows 7 , comparing to the results
> using your prior patch (removing the Cygwin specific lstat entirely) and
> get the same results with both, so this seems ok from me.
Thank you for testing this.
> My comparison point was created by reverting your current patch from pu,
> then reapplying your earlier patch on top, so the only difference was
> which approach was used to address the stat functions.
>
> Caveats:
> 1) I don't find any speed improvement of the current patch over the
> previous one (the tests actually ran faster with the earlier patch,
> though the difference was less than 1%).
> 2) I still question this whole approach, especially having this
> non-POSIX compliant mode be the default. Running in this mode breaks
> interoperability with Linux, but providing a Linux environment is the
> *primary* goal of Cygwin.
Yes, I agree. Since I _always_ disable the Win32 stat functions (by
setting core.filemode by hand - yes it's a little annoying), I don't
get any "benefit" from the added complexity.
However, I don't use git on cygwin with *large* repositories. git.git
is pretty much as large as it gets. So, the difference in performance
for me amounts to something like 0.120s -> 0.260s, which I can barely
notice.
Other people may not be so lucky ...
I would be happy if my original patch (removing the win32 stat funcs)
was applied, but others may not be. :-P
ATB,
Ramsay Jones
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-16 21:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-10 20:23 [RFC/PATCH v2 1/1] cygwin: Add fast_lstat() and fast_fstat() functions Ramsay Jones
2013-07-14 16:15 ` Mark Levedahl
2013-07-15 19:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-07-16 2:06 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2013-07-16 3:54 ` Mark Levedahl
2013-07-16 15:42 ` Dmitry Potapov
2013-07-16 22:52 ` Mark Levedahl
2013-07-18 17:50 ` Ramsay Jones
2013-07-18 21:49 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2013-07-18 22:36 ` Mark Levedahl
2013-07-18 23:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-07-19 15:34 ` Mark Levedahl
2013-07-16 3:44 ` Mark Levedahl
2013-07-16 21:36 ` Ramsay Jones [this message]
2013-07-16 23:13 ` Mark Levedahl
2013-07-18 17:43 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51E5BCDF.5070004@ramsay1.demon.co.uk \
--to=ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk \
--cc=dpotapov@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
--cc=mhagger@alum.mit.edu \
--cc=mlevedahl@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
--cc=tboegi@web.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).