From: Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
To: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Cc: Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] rebase: write better reflog messages
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:39:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C1442A.2010904@viscovery.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1371581737-10013-7-git-send-email-artagnon@gmail.com>
Am 6/18/2013 20:55, schrieb Ramkumar Ramachandra:
> Now that the "checkout" invoked internally from "rebase" knows to honor
> GIT_REFLOG_ACTION, we can start to use it to write a better reflog
> message when "rebase anotherbranch", "rebase --onto branch",
> etc. internally checks out the new fork point. We will write:
>
> rebase: checkout master
>
> instead of the old
>
> rebase
> diff --git a/git-rebase--am.sh b/git-rebase--am.sh
> index 34e3102..69fae7a 100644
> --- a/git-rebase--am.sh
> +++ b/git-rebase--am.sh
> @@ -5,11 +5,13 @@
>
> case "$action" in
> continue)
> + GIT_REFLOG_ACTION="$base_reflog_action"
I haven't followed the topic closely, but I wonder why there are so many
explicit assignments to GIT_REFLOG_ACTION. Is calling set_reflog_action
(defined in git-sh-setup) the wrong thing to do?
-- Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-19 5:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-18 18:55 [PATCH v2 0/7] Re-roll rr/rebase-checkout-reflog Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-06-18 18:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] t/t7512-status-help: test "HEAD detached from" Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-06-18 18:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] wt-status: remove unused field in grab_1st_switch_cbdata Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-06-18 18:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] t/t2012-checkout-last: test "checkout -" after a rebase Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-06-18 18:55 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] status: do not depend on rebase reflog messages Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-06-18 18:55 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] checkout: respect GIT_REFLOG_ACTION Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-06-18 18:55 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] rebase: write better reflog messages Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-06-18 20:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-06-19 5:39 ` Johannes Sixt [this message]
2013-06-19 6:09 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-06-19 6:24 ` Johannes Sixt
2013-06-19 16:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-06-19 17:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-06-19 18:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-06-18 18:55 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] rebase -i: " Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-06-18 20:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-06-18 20:38 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-06-18 20:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-06-19 4:07 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51C1442A.2010904@viscovery.net \
--to=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
--cc=artagnon@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).