From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5191F1F5AE for ; Sat, 8 May 2021 04:27:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230300AbhEHE2H (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 May 2021 00:28:07 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42588 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229523AbhEHE2G (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 May 2021 00:28:06 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1036.google.com (mail-pj1-x1036.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1036]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 093C3C061574 for ; Fri, 7 May 2021 21:27:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1036.google.com with SMTP id b14-20020a17090a6e0eb0290155c7f6a356so5664413pjk.0 for ; Fri, 07 May 2021 21:27:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bF0etiCkQs2lvtZHPnRxrIy6c4LJSR7OwSL10pCnYNY=; b=mhxy5AK/7Sdx0sqSP4sRP98XT+pbwVnckH3uOlp55lhZBA6uM8b1pSrA35VGJHWt+j x8x2IbBNueZaHHnYzHUmAThguHGuDaJ1nQzNWJA44ws3gI5+4hmyobSxCFPykj2oN8AZ wQWJtM8sf5Y2ynxndkJ+RZ1RACLL1IG9McY+eeh7J88Y1KwDemJw/A1XY8bNvabBFlJN gP/ibTJl1iJ+5l9GAkkObGbNdIzTdYNDJS7rZSq8V+A1YP63zCNXVBsawUZhCSMGWS5B qV/7JqLajSh9JhJIRktUocu+tLMyq7gXU8AFIEcJ6VyYpy90idcpUt7t7pZTxrzefYFL zY+g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=bF0etiCkQs2lvtZHPnRxrIy6c4LJSR7OwSL10pCnYNY=; b=W9rCka69s2on0j8MiyOZuFH/znIBm+6w7wqqneGuXF1fi8g9zGPGI0GBIGbK7/UtUZ LrPaGCQ8UtbgMKXKkhXcDUK3+sZIWgwUyZYw8lay9vodAmn2bT6LcTnzE56XAGlaRSck l9eGNa/edodF2BUxFvZEptC3pAPbcCH3mVqkz5K432qh/nmjQ44lLzuCFEonE4fIgpf8 nP3SWnxUzgiaK19IBx0ioygZ2kGZsvyC/hcWp4wmPilhuxz+ayvcTG3XU7ptqrXe4UNJ xUD276zrdNnQ5rmuyz4AzCRmdRebr214gO0NYH8z9c3GDUsrMCJ/NcBVRRM4t4A781Il qKSA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532QjB+tfFB0dwwKn2t6mQjhYoJ3QZP2ibsddQnV2Dnn2BZTvNLh uCDsy8AFwt9dj+jcInTpuJaBDw3yWXM51Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxogkZDOLODDp7Ok17ATkyLJp/9LzgzUQYKVyDIBDnKjQwuQqndB5k8vDJG4bCk/MfEoyb8xg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1e51:: with SMTP id pi17mr25689490pjb.5.1620448024291; Fri, 07 May 2021 21:27:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.43.80] (subs03-180-214-233-72.three.co.id. [180.214.233.72]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p11sm5804027pjo.19.2021.05.07.21.27.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 07 May 2021 21:27:04 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [RFC suggestion] Generate manpage directly with Asciidoctor To: Felipe Contreras , =?UTF-8?B?xJBvw6BuIFRy4bqnbiBDw7RuZyBEYW5o?= Cc: Git Users References: <3461c7b0-594d-989e-3048-2fc6583084ad@gmail.com> <6095c74993f19_cfc72085d@natae.notmuch> From: Bagas Sanjaya Message-ID: <5130bb11-002c-9aa9-ac6d-11bfd6f85f3f@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 8 May 2021 11:27:01 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6095c74993f19_cfc72085d@natae.notmuch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On 08/05/21 06.03, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> I think we're better to do like this: >> >> * If we're using asciidoc, we will use xmlto >> * If we're using asciidoctor, we will generate man-pages with >> asciidoctor directly > > This certainly is the way to go. > > I'm not sure if Bagas suggested to make USE_ASCIIDOCTOR=YesPlease the > default, but first we would need to make sure the output without xmlto > is desirable, which we don't at the moment. I'm not aiming for defaulting to AsciiDoctor, but I agree that we would like to migrate away from xmlto by making sure the output sans it is desirable. > So, even if we were to consider this, *first* the option to use pure > asciidoctor needs to be in place. Don't you know there is USE_ASCIIDOCTOR=YesPlease flag which do the job? -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara