From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: erratic behavior commit --allow-empty Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 08:27:42 +0200 Message-ID: <506BDADE.4010803@viscovery.net> References: <506AA51E.9010209@viscovery.net> <7vzk449449.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vhaqc7in6.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <506BCF19.7020800@viscovery.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Junio C Hamano , git To: Angelo Borsotti X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Oct 03 08:28:18 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TJIR3-0000yk-Bu for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Oct 2012 08:27:57 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752421Ab2JCG1s (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Oct 2012 02:27:48 -0400 Received: from so.liwest.at ([212.33.55.24]:30515 "EHLO so.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751629Ab2JCG1r (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Oct 2012 02:27:47 -0400 Received: from [81.10.228.254] (helo=theia.linz.viscovery) by so.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TJIQp-0005uQ-D4; Wed, 03 Oct 2012 08:27:43 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.95] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.95]) by theia.linz.viscovery (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1303D1660F; Wed, 3 Oct 2012 08:27:43 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Not answering questions does not help anyone. My question was: What is the point in insisting that there is a *really* new commit when the one commit that already existed has exactly the content that you wanted? -- Hannes