From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,LIST_MIRROR_RECEIVED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 553D21F852 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 12:08:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240310AbiBWMIL (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Feb 2022 07:08:11 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41578 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240377AbiBWMIB (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Feb 2022 07:08:01 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com (mail-wr1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06C925B899 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 04:07:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id p9so39223893wra.12 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 04:07:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:reply-to:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9Jd3N0pqaLgdNNFLVXWnp9j7uT76Dt193lP9hrDZkv8=; b=dIS75twhqET3Og7MATRgeMbSP9UUOsxNBsDLSReSYHLxhIO1rK4e472ALslufVIotM 0rLuyGAekKL7izuSDwH0shWAZxgwuQFH3rPY9VJDBljjtMOgo0voPn6mLEy7s71Pa1rK d6lqqCjgqO1CdYGsd21x0LcbNO1Q2tyxkjLjENNYwgZH+usJ4PkA8HVNzIfo1KUnIPbE 4lLpMStDbJ6Lrqw0X0lTK2v9y9QWCQdDJzB0mSwHtCkZbyBmuKCivjAYhX7LvlBmAluV orwucF3Yw4hV9o5I13ehoFQ6IMBrKrMP7BZ0w1Nh9DoqQ0SJ+q1ilyOuvb2+0vWamkQS nBzA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:reply-to :subject:content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9Jd3N0pqaLgdNNFLVXWnp9j7uT76Dt193lP9hrDZkv8=; b=aezt/KZh6NYz3RjqwoLOIuwhhSiBX0atquPfgLf505tG6az3hIZIQiPh2gZasDAgLj nHdZ82rnKEwqcYm4a/0yRG+1XFjhdUwrMGo/KNr8NA11+NemQNeLTtFGodz4sD2pZ1kw JIOl8nFMsbo0IjeZbrlPTrPE+6Yyr57+ps0evXm4RGMpQgEspL6VH/rT9AqZ4t2RtEBg sn4w4FXfNZUjTzQCBRaRqSrszEn5+JmDMVXMCBxXI/+fEusVzu0qa8gwd/SKLc5grvWn yTWDL6ZXOMVMHSAcBG+H3xxgMTz/JWRdO+OB/Qwpj6DefZlu42RoxWtfchKSamXk6YGQ oReg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532pIWLSlipfzUGc7oc4odtha5NtR+K9Nnp6EllLkPhhtLsYOfec ban9EWXuLlr5jyW32j7L9ak= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJydCiUbO9NPEPMmPzN9SkJgH4AbHd3OBGtQLHTNS0A++lZLYs5qLd13rDt25Z0YXuPkOL3Mqg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:156d:b0:1e6:db9f:a8bf with SMTP id 13-20020a056000156d00b001e6db9fa8bfmr23067609wrz.162.1645618034524; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 04:07:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.201] ([31.185.185.186]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id f13sm1688968wrf.15.2022.02.23.04.07.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 23 Feb 2022 04:07:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <505afc19-25bd-7ccb-7fb2-26bcc9d47119@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 12:07:13 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.1 Reply-To: phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] ci: make Git's GitHub workflow output much more helpful Content-Language: en-US To: =?UTF-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsCBCamFybWFzb24=?= , Johannes Schindelin Cc: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano References: <220220.86bkz1d7hm.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> <220222.86tucr6kz5.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> From: Phillip Wood In-Reply-To: <220222.86tucr6kz5.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On 22/02/2022 13:31, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > [...] > So just to make the point about one of those mentioned in my [1] with > some further details (I won't go into the whole thing to avoid repeating > myself): > > I opened both of: > > https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/runs/4822802185?check_suite_focus=true > https://github.com/dscho/git/runs/4840190622?check_suite_focus=true > > Just now in Firefox 91.5.0esr-1. Both having been opened before, so > they're in cache, and I've got a current 40MB/s real downlink speed etc. > > The former fully loads in around 5100ms, with your series here that's > just short of 18000ms. > > So your CI changes are making the common case of just looking at a CI > failure more than **3x as slow as before**. I don't think that is the most useful comparison between the two. When I am investigating a test failure the time that matters to me is the time it takes to display the output of the failing test case. With the first link above the initial page load is faster but to get to the output of the failing test case I have click on "Run ci/print_test_failures.sh" then wait for that to load and then search for "not ok" to actually get to the information I'm after. With the second link the initial page load does feel slower but then I'm presented with the test failures nicely highlighted in red, all I have to do is click on one and I've got the information I'm after. Overall that is much faster and easier to use. Best Wishes Phillip