From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 2/2] rebase [-i --exec | -ix] ... Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 19:02:57 +0200 Message-ID: <4FD23041.90908@kdbg.org> References: <1338978856-26838-1-git-send-email-Lucien.Kong@ensimag.imag.fr> <1339167235-2009-1-git-send-email-Lucien.Kong@ensimag.imag.fr> <1339167235-2009-2-git-send-email-Lucien.Kong@ensimag.imag.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Valentin Duperray , Franck Jonas , Thomas Nguy , Huynh Khoi Nguyen Nguyen , Matthieu Moy To: Lucien Kong X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jun 08 19:03:08 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Sd2aa-00014q-5N for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 19:03:08 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761535Ab2FHRDD (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jun 2012 13:03:03 -0400 Received: from bsmtp.bon.at ([213.33.87.14]:16458 "EHLO bsmtp.bon.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758198Ab2FHRDB (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jun 2012 13:03:01 -0400 Received: from dx.sixt.local (unknown [93.83.142.38]) by bsmtp.bon.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id C613FCDF88; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 19:04:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by dx.sixt.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4249219F6E9; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 19:02:58 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120421 Thunderbird/12.0 Newsgroups: gmane.comp.version-control.git In-Reply-To: <1339167235-2009-2-git-send-email-Lucien.Kong@ensimag.imag.fr> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Am 08.06.2012 16:53, schrieb Lucien Kong: > +if test -n "$cmd" && > + test "$interactive_rebase" != explicit > +then > + die "--exec option must be used with --interactive option\n" > +fi Is the \n really necessary? > + sed -e "1,9d" expect >expected && Good. But I said "Here and everywhere else". So I wonder about these lines ;) > + sed '1,9d' expect >expected && > + sed '1,9d' expect >expected && > + sed '1,9d' expect >expected && > + sed '1,11d' expect >expected && > + sed '1,13d' expect >expected && > + sed '1d' actual >tmp && -- Hannes