From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] submodules: Use relative paths to gitdir and work tree Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 21:40:46 +0100 Message-ID: <4F57C7CE.1050005@kdbg.org> References: <4F53DA95.2020402@web.de> <7v8vjcq5v3.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jens Lehmann , Git Mailing List , Antony Male , Phil Hord , Johannes Schindelin , msysGit Mailinglist To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Mar 07 21:41:07 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S5NfX-00076u-CW for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 21:41:07 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759612Ab2CGUkv (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Mar 2012 15:40:51 -0500 Received: from bsmtp4.bon.at ([195.3.86.186]:13231 "EHLO bsmtp.bon.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759609Ab2CGUku (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Mar 2012 15:40:50 -0500 Received: from dx.sixt.local (unknown [93.83.142.38]) by bsmtp.bon.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8706CA7EB5; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 21:41:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by dx.sixt.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B0F219F604; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 21:40:46 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de; rv:1.9.2.27) Gecko/20120215 SUSE/3.1.19 Thunderbird/3.1.19 In-Reply-To: <7v8vjcq5v3.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Am 07.03.2012 07:31, schrieb Junio C Hamano: > Jens Lehmann writes: >> This is the third round of the former two patch series. It applies >> cleanly on current master and maint and IMO is maint stuff as it fixes >> bugs related to submodules. Those were introduced when moving the git >> directory into that of the superproject and using a gitfile instead. > > I looked at this again and think this addresses the review comments > made during the previous round, but I would like to get "Yay" from > people who helped reviewing the previous round. Yay. The topic passes the test suite. -- Hannes