From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael J Gruber Subject: Re: [PATCH] pathspec: rename per-item field has_wildcard to use_wildcard Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2011 10:29:19 +0200 Message-ID: <4D9EC75F.1060901@drmicha.warpmail.net> References: <7vr59gl581.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vfwpvjobl.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <4D9D9B60.4030404@drmicha.warpmail.net> <7vvcypeti4.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vr59detcu.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Apr 08 08:29:32 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q85CE-00089N-UY for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 08:29:31 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753800Ab1DHG3Y (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2011 02:29:24 -0400 Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:41033 "EHLO out2.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753198Ab1DHG3Y (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2011 02:29:24 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.44]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D08C207E8; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 02:29:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 08 Apr 2011 02:29:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=messagingengine.com; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpout; bh=6TmQx9uGGw2wiLIO7tLIFPw9CY0=; b=tCfQeHNy3n60T4GIVDAgsPP8mJHA501ciD8AIIElZ0tcN3PWlxsevWWbpK5OqY8H7avbfb7Z+YdO95gqx1UbkVSxAyccWrjx6U9oUKbIgpBWNVhx3Ot+C97a9112xT8M+eCRBrALVft03X+JU9I+8heweEEUML/2rsZhhwYMHn0= X-Sasl-enc: J0jWCs4mGeXtYW1aI6aFVJkmZoIPqOErZ5TdzEXL6o/Y 1302244163 Received: from localhost.localdomain (whitehead.math.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.44.62]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0A3BA4045D4; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 02:29:22 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110305 Remi/fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.9 In-Reply-To: <7vr59detcu.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano venit, vidit, dixit 07.04.2011 21:47: > Junio C Hamano writes: > >> Because I doubt that the major restructuring we discussed earlier won't be >> ready within the 1.7.6 timeframe,... > > I think people involved in this thread have dealt with my bad writing long > enough and understood what I meant, but just in case, I meant to say that > I do not think restructuring would be ready to ship with 1.7.6, > in other words, s/won't/will/ is needed above. > > Sorry for a noise. No problem, that was clear from the context. "Doubt" is such a weak form of negation that many people miss that possible double negation. In several languages (or even dialects) a double negation is a strong form of negation. The time line sounds very sane, and I'm with the parentheses. What I'm wondering about are :foo and :foo:bar (which have no modifiers to parse). I thought you meant to eat the ":" only in the former and not the latter but I guess I was mistaken. Maybe we can make the ":" literal when it can't be parsed, or make it do something (":/" as you suggested), because swallowing it and then doing nothing seems doubly bad. Michael