From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Pollak Subject: Re: [PATCH] Docs gitk: Explicitly mention -d, --date-order option Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 10:05:31 +0200 Message-ID: <4D95874B.9040209@jku.at> References: <1f748ec60804180616i311571eftbabcd3133ff83302@mail.gmail.com> <7v1w52ib5d.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Clifford Caoile , Git Mailing List To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Apr 01 10:06:01 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5ZMm-0006ty-MU for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 10:06:01 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751980Ab1DAIFj (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Apr 2011 04:05:39 -0400 Received: from email.edvz.uni-linz.ac.at ([140.78.3.58]:56046 "EHLO email.uni-linz.ac.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751299Ab1DAIFg (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Apr 2011 04:05:36 -0400 Received: from [192.168.168.60] (unknown [140.78.223.2]) by email.uni-linz.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BC9CB8C6; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 10:05:34 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 In-Reply-To: <7v1w52ib5d.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 OpenPGP: id=ADDE9E08; url= Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hello Junio, you wrote on 2008-04-18: > "Clifford Caoile" writes: [...] >> Regarding the documentation patch "[PATCH] Docs gitk: Explicitly >> mention -d, --date-order option" [1] (2008-04-12), it has not been >> accepted. Is there problem with this patch? >> >> References: >> [1] http://marc.info/?l=git&m=120799377618677&w=2 > > There isn't anything _wrong_ with the patch per se, but the current > documentation refers you to rev-list page and limits itself to the most > often used options. > > I was waiting to see that many people jumping up and down saying that the > omission of --date-order from the "most often used" set was a grave bug > before applying it. It hasn't happened. This thread has helped me finding "-d" (which is gitk-specific). So here's my vote for the patch, FWIW. Robert