From: "Philip Oakley" <philipoakley@iee.org>
To: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>,
"Steffen Prohaska" <prohaska@zib.de>
Cc: "Andreas Ericsson" <ae@op5.se>,
"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
"Git Mailing List" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
"Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>,
spearce@spearce.org,
"Johannes Schindelin" <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: Is anyone working on a next-gen Git protocol?
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 23:32:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CD4F3E1194047F5B91D4D4E1CE146AC@PhilipOakley> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 7vlifeawd5.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org
From: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>
> Steffen Prohaska <prohaska@zib.de> writes:
>
>> I've recently discovered that the current protocol can be amazingly
>> inefficient when it comes to transferring binary objects. Assuming
>> two
>> repositories that are in sync. After a 'git checkout --orphan && git
>> commit', a subsequent transfers sends all the blobs attached to the
>> new
>> commit, although the other side already has all the blobs.
>
> I do not think it has anything to do with binary, but what you
> deserve from using orphan, where you declared that the history does
> not have anything to do with the original.
>
> If both of your repositories had the two paralle lines of these
> histories as branches, the transfer would have went well with or
> without binary objects.
> --
Steffen,
An alternative could be a shallow clone for just those branches with the
binary objects, so that the git objects are still identical. Or use a
replace/graft to trim the line of development. It's still a fudge, but
something you could look at.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-10 22:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-07 19:57 Is anyone working on a next-gen Git protocol? Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2012-10-07 20:22 ` Ilari Liusvaara
2012-10-07 22:08 ` Jeff King
2012-10-07 22:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-10-22 4:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-10-08 9:05 ` Andreas Ericsson
2012-10-08 16:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-10-10 19:13 ` Steffen Prohaska
2012-10-10 20:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-10-10 22:32 ` Philip Oakley [this message]
2012-10-11 1:44 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2012-10-11 3:08 ` Shawn Pearce
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CD4F3E1194047F5B91D4D4E1CE146AC@PhilipOakley \
--to=philipoakley@iee.org \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=ae@op5.se \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=prohaska@zib.de \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).