From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joshua Jensen Subject: Re: Differing results between gitk --follow and git log --follow Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 13:00:04 -0600 Message-ID: <4CAE18B4.2050700@workspacewhiz.com> References: <4CAE0DB0.1090608@workspacewhiz.com> <20101007181854.GF18518@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "git@vger.kernel.org" To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Oct 07 21:00:58 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3vi5-0002QX-Kb for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 21:00:58 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753462Ab0JGTAe (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2010 15:00:34 -0400 Received: from hsmail.qwknetllc.com ([208.71.137.138]:37057 "EHLO hsmail.qwknetllc.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753052Ab0JGTAG (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2010 15:00:06 -0400 Received: (qmail 3711 invoked by uid 399); 7 Oct 2010 13:00:04 -0600 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.2?) (jjensen@workspacewhiz.com@69.98.187.106) by hsmail.qwknetllc.com with ESMTPAM; 7 Oct 2010 13:00:04 -0600 X-Originating-IP: 69.98.187.106 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.4 In-Reply-To: <20101007181854.GF18518@sigill.intra.peff.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: ----- Original Message ----- From: Jeff King Date: 10/7/2010 12:18 PM > On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 12:13:04PM -0600, Joshua Jensen wrote: > >> Is there a way to convince gitk to show me the same bits as git log >> --follow? > Sadly, no, not without major surgery to the follow code. See: > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/147089 Interesting... and way beyond my current capabilities... :( Thanks for the response. Josh