From: Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net>,
Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>,
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] reset: add option "--merge-safe" to "git reset"
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:38:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AB1D957.20902@viscovery.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vk4zykv7o.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano schrieb:
> As we established in the previous round, this is _different_ from --merge,
> but *not* in the sense that --merge is more dangerous and users should be
> using this new option instead, but in the sense that --merge perfectly
> works well for its intended use case, and this new option triggers a mode
> of operation that is meant to be used in a completely different use case,
> which is unspecified in this series without documentation.
>
> In that light, is --merge-safe still a good name for the option, or merely
> a misleading one?
Do I understand this correctly?
(1) The intended use-case of --merge is to "reset _a_ merge".
(2) The intended use-case of --merge-safe is to point the branch head to a
different commit, but to carry the changes that currently are in the index
and wd over to the new commit, similar to checkout --merge.
I had mistaken that --merge actually performs (2) because of the striking
similarity of the option's name to checkout's --merge. So, IMHO, whatever
the new option is named that performs (2) - it introduces an
inconsistency, because --merge is already taken.
-- Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-17 6:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-17 4:14 [PATCH v3 0/4] "git reset --merge" related improvements Christian Couder
2009-09-17 4:14 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] reset: add a few tests for "git reset --merge" Christian Couder
2009-09-17 4:14 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] reset: use "unpack_trees()" directly instead of "git read-tree" Christian Couder
2009-09-17 4:14 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] reset: add option "--merge-safe" to "git reset" Christian Couder
2009-09-17 5:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-09-17 6:38 ` Johannes Sixt [this message]
2009-09-17 7:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-09-17 7:24 ` Johannes Sixt
2009-09-17 12:12 ` Christian Couder
2009-09-17 13:05 ` Johannes Sixt
2009-09-17 13:25 ` Christian Couder
2009-09-17 20:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-09-17 12:25 ` Christian Couder
2009-09-17 21:04 ` Daniel Barkalow
2009-09-17 4:14 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] reset: add test cases for "--merge-safe" option Christian Couder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AB1D957.20902@viscovery.net \
--to=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=barkalow@iabervon.org \
--cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=s-beyer@gmx.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).