From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [PATCH] diesys calls die and also reports strerror(errno) Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 08:25:02 +0200 Message-ID: <4A28BA3E.3090800@viscovery.net> References: <20090603015503.GA14166@coredump.intra.peff.net> <1244081105-7149-1-git-send-email-aspotashev@gmail.com> <20090604205055.GB17478@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alexander Potashev , Junio C Hamano , Git Mailing List , Thomas Rast To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jun 05 08:25:30 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MCSrm-0006pd-Ei for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 08:25:26 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752800AbZFEGZI (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jun 2009 02:25:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751880AbZFEGZH (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jun 2009 02:25:07 -0400 Received: from lilzmailso01.liwest.at ([212.33.55.23]:42514 "EHLO lilzmailso01.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751501AbZFEGZG (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jun 2009 02:25:06 -0400 Received: from cm56-163-160.liwest.at ([86.56.163.160] helo=linz.eudaptics.com) by lilzmailso01.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MCSrO-0006Qb-Hi; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 08:25:02 +0200 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.96]) by linz.eudaptics.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A9A54E4; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 08:25:02 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: <20090604205055.GB17478@sigill.intra.peff.net> X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King schrieb: > On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 06:05:05AM +0400, Alexander Potashev wrote: >> +void diesys(const char *err, ...) Am I the only one who thinks that 'die_errno' would be a better name for this function? -- Hannes