git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2018, #05; Mon, 24)
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 20:33:47 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4768f982-51bd-aeec-9b6b-fc36f2f512f3@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqmus6r1ml.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>

On 9/24/2018 6:06 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> * ds/reachable (2018-09-21) 2 commits
>    (merged to 'next' on 2018-09-21 at d4cd62108e)
>   + commit-reach: fix memory and flag leaks
>   + commit-reach: properly peel tags
>
>   Recent update broke the reachability algorithm when refs (e.g.
>   tags) that point at objects that are not commit were involved,
>   which has been fixed.
>   Hotfix for a topic already in 'master'.

Sorry that I took so long to reroll a v4. The changes from v3 to v4 are 
mostly cleanup, so I'll send those as a single commit later, and they 
don't need to be rushed to master as nothing is broken in the version 
you merged.


> * ds/reachable-topo-order (2018-09-21) 7 commits
>   - revision.c: refactor basic topo-order logic
>   - revision.h: add whitespace in flag definitions
>   - commit/revisions: bookkeeping before refactoring
>   - revision.c: begin refactoring --topo-order logic
>   - test-reach: add rev-list tests
>   - test-reach: add run_three_modes method
>   - prio-queue: add 'peek' operation
>
>   The revision walker machinery learned to take advantage of the
>   commit generation numbers stored in the commit-graph file.

I've had limited review of this topic that is very exciting (to me). I 
know that last commit is a bit daunting, but I'd love someone to take a 
look.


> * ds/format-commit-graph-docs (2018-08-21) 2 commits
>   - commit-graph.txt: improve formatting for asciidoc
>   - Docs: Add commit-graph tech docs to Makefile
>
>   Design docs for the commit-graph machinery is now made into HTML as
>   well as text.
>
>   Will discard.
>   I am inclined to drop these, as I do not see much clarity in HTML
>   output over the text source.  Opinions?

Just a reminder that we agreed to drop this series.

Thanks,

-Stolee


      reply	other threads:[~2018-09-25  0:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-24 22:06 What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2018, #05; Mon, 24) Junio C Hamano
2018-09-25  0:33 ` Derrick Stolee [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4768f982-51bd-aeec-9b6b-fc36f2f512f3@gmail.com \
    --to=stolee@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).