From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] Rework strbuf API and semantics. Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 17:45:22 +0200 Message-ID: <46E02092.9020805@eudaptics.com> References: <20070902224213.GB431@artemis.corp> <11890776114037-git-send-email-madcoder@debian.org> <118907761140-git-send-email-madcoder@debian.org> <20070906142155.GB3002@coredump.intra.peff.net> <857in3dfad.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <20070906145035.GA3546@coredump.intra.peff.net> <85tzq7bzoz.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jeff King , Johannes Schindelin , Pierre Habouzit , git@vger.kernel.org To: David Kastrup X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Sep 06 17:45:34 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ITJXx-00050v-EV for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 17:45:33 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757019AbXIFPp2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:45:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757015AbXIFPp2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:45:28 -0400 Received: from lilzmailso02.liwest.at ([212.33.55.13]:29315 "EHLO lilzmailso02.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757019AbXIFPp1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:45:27 -0400 Received: from cm56-163-160.liwest.at ([86.56.163.160] helo=linz.eudaptics.com) by lilzmailso02.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1ITJXm-0000fQ-TX; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 17:45:23 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.42] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.42]) by linz.eudaptics.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79DFD4E4; Thu, 6 Sep 2007 17:45:22 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) In-Reply-To: <85tzq7bzoz.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, AWL=-0.374, BAYES_99=3.5 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: David Kastrup schrieb: > Jeff King writes: >> See ISO 9899:1999, section 6.7.8. >> >> Paragraph 10: >> >> If an object that has automatic storage duration is not initialized >> explicitly, its value is indeterminate. If an object that has static >> storage duration is not initialized explicitly, then: >> >> -- if it has pointer type, it is initialized to a null pointer; > > That's actually a new one to me. I don't think that it has been > always the case in ANSI C. AFAIR, this has always been the case. -- Hannes