Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Marius Storm-Olsen wrote:
>> The conversion of the FileTime to unix time_t is far more heavy.
> 
> Really?  If so, we might consider storing FILETIME->dwHightDateTime
> and ->dwLowDateTime in the index.
> 
> But I doubt it.  AFAICT _getting_ at the stat data is the expensive
> thing in Windows, not a 64-bit addition, subtraction and division.

Haha, sure sure, _getting_ that stat data in the first place is the
expensive part on Windows. However, that's something you _have_ to do no
matter what, so there's no way around that.

Turns out that it wasn't as bad as i thought. If you have
filetime_to_time_t() just return, say 116444736, I see
    git add . improve with ~0.5 sec for 100K files
and git status improve with 0.05 sec

Surely, avoiding the tripple stat'ing in 'git status' would help a lot
more ;-) So, I guess we'll just leave the timestamp conversion as is,
and avoid complicating the index.

--
.marius