From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C98B61F66F for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 17:22:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725799AbgJaRWL (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Oct 2020 13:22:11 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57594 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725497AbgJaRWK (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Oct 2020 13:22:10 -0400 Received: from mail-qv1-xf44.google.com (mail-qv1-xf44.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f44]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0B3AC0617A6 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 10:22:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qv1-xf44.google.com with SMTP id i17so2225807qvp.11 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 10:22:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=hWAe+e1/j45ft49DRqWmyRxYDKkng7l4eXHjiRXSdeM=; b=Lm0t+K+br/i77qoOy9HfI3jNtk2rDs4hw4n3uwM1hqGPyYuoQ3xwLt4E1cH28dJ5ph L36mS6+q80RpCdG7lvWvUdABxMuT8rvG/odmrJrnl++u6bMBKly986ioYhOhQlx325Ge vlSTdBej7dCCPZWR6kQirOH4Ox76G4CrS7hz9QqVOCrp0oFF/aJwl5INGOnfwUPoixRZ KbdrtmzNucHEY5f9NWLPo6Sr3L+2lbn8FuU+upHvBXQu0R+OO+cEBfQ2kW0/HoLP6fpH TsAh/s1m/WQPIOKME1bGhJA/0A2X2sEoQ9VSQqo6Snnyk9L/J8qnIWTXMufQJd8mQNLT exaA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=hWAe+e1/j45ft49DRqWmyRxYDKkng7l4eXHjiRXSdeM=; b=EF4tmur7QCBXmMDdIfOAJu2d7BIFpqoGoXX1ltbbsnp7dBsLDb6LAr8rrEdvgR72Uq 1H75GMc5Ukx0uZYJcbt6lZG+VljTp+6iAFt0PNjPB7VNV4vI7FDrQuo8XFKHgMUmpAe4 V5IjYZbuf4buLbvhq0FIfK+5t9NxkrLNxHFgfesuqQVK6z2AlIuQiCGGnYjqbZrCZWKU hlhAaBtjSUqg3xYJ1oTQL2bzkf9yeEe0ptfmRT9MuKk/EgFohhNakKpFeceyGLwPpRjX Cgl4NeJiUMezsia9OsJGidfpBZH8yBm8k18orubW7NDebdZmtCzl9YPDkAp6WNlSrYGn 4t5Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533xodDafx0lPjlpogAykwacta8A7P5GWeaMZGhyl9y/ha+/PxvQ 5ysKWpVO1z4JSbNgDMEDN9Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzvjcNBF5/uqKHa2YH+YCc7cggGjHG0H0sBFNv8Ig0b4Yfzs6uhEubxGe7rk1ujaNnoqEHpOA== X-Received: by 2002:ad4:4d47:: with SMTP id m7mr14741720qvm.32.1604164929956; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 10:22:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.127] ([192.222.216.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n1sm2864531qkn.13.2020.10.31.10.22.08 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 31 Oct 2020 10:22:09 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] blame-options.txt: also mention 'funcname' in '-L' description From: Philippe Blain In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 13:22:07 -0400 Cc: Philippe Blain via GitGitGadget , Git mailing list , Thomas Rast , Eric Sunshine , =?utf-8?Q?Ren=C3=A9_Scharfe?= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <45C117E5-1855-4BE5-A021-D1438B770A21@gmail.com> References: To: Junio C Hamano X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org > Le 29 oct. 2020 =C3=A0 16:25, Junio C Hamano a = =C3=A9crit : >=20 > "Philippe Blain via GitGitGadget" writes: >=20 >> From: Philippe Blain >>=20 >> Make it clearer that a function can be blamed by feeding `git blame` >> '-L :' by mentioning it at the beginnning of the = description >> of the '-L' option. >=20 > I think it makes tons of sense to mention both , range > and range in the description. >=20 > It is not a new issue you are introducing with this change, but I > think the latter does not deserve to be treated as if it were an > afterthought by being a mere parenthetical mention. I agree. I'll address that for the next version.