From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: Steven Grimm Subject: Re: What's in git.git (stable) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 09:12:46 -0800 Message-ID: <4584290E.6080006@midwinter.com> References: <7v4przfpir.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vhcvwomde.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <200612152348.17997.jnareb@gmail.com> <7vac1on2oh.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7v4prwn0lp.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 17:12:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Narebski Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Macintosh/20061025) In-Reply-To: <7v4prwn0lp.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Gvd5S-00088q-5Z for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 18:12:38 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161257AbWLPRMf (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:12:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161256AbWLPRMf (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:12:35 -0500 Received: from tater.midwinter.com ([216.32.86.90]:34097 "HELO midwinter.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1161257AbWLPRMf (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:12:35 -0500 Received: (qmail 32151 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2006 17:12:34 -0000 Received: from c-76-21-17-123.hsd1.ca.comcast.net (HELO ?192.168.0.128?) (koreth@76.21.17.123) by tater.midwinter.com with SMTP; 16 Dec 2006 17:12:34 -0000 To: Junio C Hamano Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano wrote: > It's just a common courtesy, not "tackling". > Interesting. I'd actually prefer people *remove* me from the CC list -- I find it annoying to get two copies of every message in threads I reply to. I'm already subscribed to the mailing list, so there's no point having me on the Cc line too. (Mind you, as annoyances go it's a pretty insignificant one.) I can understand the case of people who aren't on the list wanting to get replies, but why does someone who *is* on the list want to be CCed? Is it just that there's no good way to tell in advance which category a given person falls into, so best to be on the safe side?