From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: Andreas Ericsson Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-add --interactive (wip) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:20:34 +0100 Message-ID: <457FC5E2.9040709@op5.se> References: <360959.72234.qm@web31809.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <7vd56s8t9w.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vslfm23co.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <200612111147.44964.Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de> <7vwt4wpytm.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:44:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Junio C Hamano , Josef Weidendorfer , git@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060913) In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GuQfB-0007m3-0D for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:44:33 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932642AbWLMJoa (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Dec 2006 04:44:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932643AbWLMJoa (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Dec 2006 04:44:30 -0500 Received: from linux-server1.op5.se ([193.201.96.2]:41833 "EHLO smtp-gw1.op5.se" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932642AbWLMJo3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Dec 2006 04:44:29 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.20] (unknown [213.88.215.14]) by smtp-gw1.op5.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD6C46BCC3; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:20:34 +0100 (CET) To: Johannes Schindelin Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> So in short, I think per-hunk update-index is a cute hack and may be >> useful in a narrow simple cases, but it would not be so useful in the >> real life. > > To the contrary! In spite of having written git-hunk-commit to please > those poor souls coming from the darcs side, I already used it myself > quite often! I think it is a killer feature. > I've tried it a couple of times as well, and it really is very, very nice, especially for young projects where you know you have to make loads of changes (often basic and codewise small features). -- Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@op5.se OP5 AB www.op5.se