From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tim Ottinger <tottinge@progeny.com>
Subject: Tool renames? was Re: First stab at glossary
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 10:03:13 -0500
Message-ID: <430C8C31.1070902@progeny.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0508171655250.13502@wgmdd8.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0508171341380.23242@iabervon.org> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0508172156090.17234@wgmdd8.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0508171630140.23242@iabervon.org> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0508180009180.18104@wgmdd8.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Aug 24 17:04:40 2005
Return-path: <git-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1E7wn5-0004UW-PO
	for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 17:03:48 +0200
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1750932AbVHXPDo (ORCPT <rfc822;gcvg-git@m.gmane.org>);
	Wed, 24 Aug 2005 11:03:44 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750946AbVHXPDo
	(ORCPT <rfc822;git-outgoing>); Wed, 24 Aug 2005 11:03:44 -0400
Received: from zealot.progeny.com ([216.37.46.162]:31725 "EHLO
	morimoto.progeny.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750932AbVHXPDo (ORCPT <rfc822;git@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 24 Aug 2005 11:03:44 -0400
Received: from [192.168.1.95] (inigo.progeny.com [192.168.1.95])
	by morimoto.progeny.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68D90636AC
	for <git@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 10:03:43 -0500 (EST)
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050802)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
To: git@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0508180009180.18104@wgmdd8.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/7709>

So when this gets all settled, will we see a lot of tool renaming? 

While it would cause me and my team some personal effort (we have
a special-purpose porcelain), it would be welcome to have a lexicon
that is sane and consistent, and in tune with all the documentation.

Others may feel differently, I understand.

-- 
                             ><>
... either 'way ahead of the game, or 'way out in left field.