From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: "git-send-pack" Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 17:07:23 -0700 Message-ID: <42C5DABB.1020505@zytor.com> References: <42C46A3C.1070104@zytor.com> <42C482ED.1010306@zytor.com> <42C5D553.80905@timesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linus Torvalds , Daniel Barkalow , Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jul 02 02:00:47 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DoVQx-00015p-IC for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2005 02:00:35 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261638AbVGBAIC (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jul 2005 20:08:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261667AbVGBAIC (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jul 2005 20:08:02 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([209.128.68.124]:27332 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261638AbVGBAHw (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jul 2005 20:07:52 -0400 Received: from [172.27.0.18] (c-67-180-239-42.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.180.239.42]) (authenticated bits=0) by terminus.zytor.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6207Nkb032105 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 1 Jul 2005 17:07:27 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-1.3.3 (X11/20050513) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: Mike Taht In-Reply-To: <42C5D553.80905@timesys.com> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.85.1, clamav-milter version 0.85 on localhost X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL autolearn=no version=3.0.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on terminus.zytor.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Mike Taht wrote: > > You are getting closer and closer to where something like bitTorrent or > a multicast protocol makes sense. The problem isn't just the number of > outstanding commit objects but the number of machines and developers > that want to grab those commits at the same time. > Not really. -hpa