From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Ferry Huberts" Subject: Re: Git for Windows 1.6.3.2 Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 17:15:44 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <41101.77.61.241.211.1244560544.squirrel@hupie.xs4all.nl> References: <26984.77.61.241.211.1244457815.squirrel@hupie.xs4all.nl> <34357.77.61.241.211.1244459143.squirrel@hupie.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: "Ferry Huberts" , "Sverre Rabbelier" , msysgit@googlegroups.com, git@vger.kernel.org To: "Johannes Schindelin" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jun 09 17:15:57 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ME33K-00019y-SR for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 17:15:55 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752440AbZFIPPq (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2009 11:15:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751997AbZFIPPp (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2009 11:15:45 -0400 Received: from hupie.xs4all.nl ([82.95.241.251]:59793 "EHLO Lighthouse.internal.Hupie.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750878AbZFIPPo (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2009 11:15:44 -0400 Received: by Lighthouse.internal.Hupie.com (Postfix, from userid 48) id 5D6D858BDD4; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 17:15:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 77.61.241.211 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ferry.huberts@pelagic.nl) by hupie.xs4all.nl with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 17:15:44 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.el5.centos.3 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: > > Just to clarify: there is no -2 release, because it is a new day. And no, > I did not like the feeling that you "expect" me to do the work at all. > > An example I positively _like_ is Tom Koelman, who tried the net installer > (pointing out an issue I had not encountered before) and built his own Git > installer, the better to help me fix bugs in the future. > wow sorry I rubbed you the wrong way. that was by no means my intention and I'm surprised that you took it that way. AFAIK I was being polite and positive. I've sent you a patch by which I made it work. I just asked whether there would be a new release _without_ expecting anything. besides, for me the -2 question was totally valid in the light of a broken installer and what you did the last time that happened I have no time to build my own installer. I guess we're both swamped by work...