From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A28591F5AE for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 05:16:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229872AbhDVFRL (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Apr 2021 01:17:11 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55262 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229483AbhDVFRK (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Apr 2021 01:17:10 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1035.google.com (mail-pj1-x1035.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1035]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F171C06174A for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 22:16:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1035.google.com with SMTP id gq23-20020a17090b1057b0290151869af68bso319730pjb.4 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 22:16:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Lrg9uJY8CF7+ESuIbEQcsfVCSv+I/5KFI/Xx9gEzR3Q=; b=jZdmxqMTT1nQB3djGOIU4cBejRrBr+LwEAvGkli+GthlNPM03+rkw/mDkEuCGpxzUs GZHLZqHonXwehkGBTUoenWCH/wkc0RdmWtUXNVyEay5POQz0X1kqUaJX357eoREgyqY4 Rhc3cq5+HeFH2lAGBzpw4XOkpZrCvdJGx2vKJHdpttdrLc3H9n7ZklzExQTg4VQiThFe Ds3ipPz8rFFvInOqSCw8MeWNUZQ5lq+WTCzC9kX9R8tCuDyiIv2LKp1yVbZi0wAmeUYZ aX1RcLhUIrMa9zT7ngPCPKsotUPv9OGwwEqJnP/TwIZbKtOKy86EgWyk+55W2OkdD975 t24w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Lrg9uJY8CF7+ESuIbEQcsfVCSv+I/5KFI/Xx9gEzR3Q=; b=nUBkUOxLO85abOU9/HsZGV8jPjEKjIUSZQFjJpuuqKyhll8D7Df9EAgCDGu60C7e2P 3PPA4RT8k3XWUTqdixxXwZ+P3FdxVjsYl8mgEflchyzbu50GxatfcgrjLKy8AZrbN7hn RX0OZSs56RmoQHKIAF/32LQ2aOBuOWRvKE0Qi6fFxoQLwHYX3TtdeRW8JmX08ebnm/WL B98pC6U1nqF2MX2q5+XgUUsorY8W5VV/Je9jAw0I+1vwgQaNrKrNyIlKiDUDfWb9N4bZ 2LTV08GbPtv1agP5grSR7UacHK3eM/BECh77EieJe+JAL2qJcc3fRy9AjfrvQguCfI66 nYOQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530RC962u8SpnisRrPRen74qc5VyrKTphgo3lUj4yoT+VyXaiRoI OKn4pe2GgIwTBsJAyoFQptg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy2+xRCK9SVpoA3nK2DEearoLzfKgPNhZEFXA6uwT76Y5rR5GXUGXCXXTmLhXpJlW+jbIZiug== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:eac1:b029:ea:dfe4:7b44 with SMTP id p1-20020a170902eac1b02900eadfe47b44mr1617633pld.79.1619068594595; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 22:16:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.43.80] (subs02-180-214-232-88.three.co.id. [180.214.232.88]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l132sm940227pga.39.2021.04.21.22.16.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Apr 2021 22:16:34 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] test: add test for git bisect skip with --term* arguments To: Junio C Hamano Cc: trygveaa@gmail.com, git@vger.kernel.org, larsxschneider@gmail.com, chriscool@tuxfamily.org, Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de, pranit.bauva@gmail.com, tanushreetumane@gmail.com, mirucam@gmail.com References: <20210418151459.GC10839@aaberge.net> <20210421040808.14185-1-bagasdotme@gmail.com> From: Bagas Sanjaya Message-ID: <3bbc9350-60cd-9fb2-117a-add3dc5cf77e@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 12:16:30 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On 22/04/21 00.25, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I expected, as you said in your first version, that it would be > added as part of an existing test script for "git bisect". And I > suspect that you can reuse the history the existing tests in the > script already use, so you won't have to add the first "initialize" > piece. If the tested sequence should work but does not yet work due > to lack of a fix to a known bug, the test should be marked as > test_expect_failure instead of test_expect_success. So will this patch be queued? Or should I send the patch adding this test to t6030 instead of separate test script here? -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara