From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 419A71F404 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 17:39:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1946783AbeCBRjq (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Mar 2018 12:39:46 -0500 Received: from mail-pl0-f43.google.com ([209.85.160.43]:43383 "EHLO mail-pl0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1165061AbeCBRjo (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Mar 2018 12:39:44 -0500 Received: by mail-pl0-f43.google.com with SMTP id f23-v6so6077870plr.10 for ; Fri, 02 Mar 2018 09:39:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=vBWQogRUx2AlcJ33OiprxWbOcUk+d4jxBpLrEfwXQyo=; b=aXi8XNePXNTeKGJ+4p/Ju2Fa5vzMJb73qMrcYnEa3qZzs7TZ0qNCGqZFApcFSAX3S6 S9/Ct0WdfuMxEWUhP9yYHlJ7x7JiC/BUlupqUmJRdU6gMHwCkRjEvXn8vIk9JAA9tJ5J cefyGcFvLZzzAHGSnsQOlHZ/YPV9oKdhE+YKdp+B52HX6DYXTsphXmnhTxG0lY0n4FW1 poWSRoCPkMwpc2/7WDBBEvjc7iu44v6LJ+YVl9tzKhtk31m9rEmpeJqoCC6ygcZgMwNl LAE7VnfV7MLA4HzpDN0Yuz+C/7V2iVibz0yOOc7d+XdNVYwmMtBiJo9BsdHkgEfG8BQU XuyQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=vBWQogRUx2AlcJ33OiprxWbOcUk+d4jxBpLrEfwXQyo=; b=Q+j/HZlZ92qwDRu3xYPryEUlR5h1VXDGzB10e/hZvSRCtgTtegpJjjIKkRGTPrHRo2 vjoi2qeS9itMAo2FdaEYJbOFDmIVNhw9aTBeGUpReRJdWnRb4vc1cRQ+Voemd8t7wZqu L7WQ16mwAmWyMRk4UjQNAkburPbjTJVqomC7PCd6xqDNrQhirDgnAsT2FmJLhKyuVOqR aTMQjZV9ZJSYY+ASUG3NxZFywS7FbLocgr/Kt2AR1afMe60ZO7WHWz54xWcBJrfsA5i1 meylmEV5u6yzQ2s0l+cGGWckoEnSca4+doDKZLZvig9DhkMBB2E5ubgRIP1SBYTXT4uK vvAw== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPChKjCbPxah33nmYJiGxa9Dm5iyNOdsRdWzIBcZulehWJGKjSJF o6rmFvpK7McQNAcpibWL9Ro= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELuJcQjLHdU2KHYunHixKBtEVsgufMxj0SlnJPpUhCifGE8+eaKFCwf1RsGsq0PJ46tmIT1e5Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:6b04:: with SMTP id o4-v6mr5993550plk.260.1520012383766; Fri, 02 Mar 2018 09:39:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from slxbook4.ads.autodesk.com ([62.159.156.210]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u79sm16580436pfi.186.2018.03.02.09.39.42 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 02 Mar 2018 09:39:42 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2018, #01; Thu, 1) From: Lars Schneider In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 18:39:39 +0100 Cc: =?utf-8?Q?SZEDER_G=C3=A1bor?= , Git mailing list Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <3C32011B-30E5-4E63-8692-5D598430DC99@gmail.com> References: To: Junio C Hamano X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org > On 02 Mar 2018, at 18:11, Junio C Hamano wrote: >=20 > Junio C Hamano writes: >=20 >> SZEDER G=C3=A1bor writes: >>=20 >>> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 11:20 PM, Junio C Hamano = wrote: >>>=20 >>>> * sg/travis-build-during-script-phase (2018-01-08) 1 commit >>>> - travis-ci: build Git during the 'script' phase >>>>=20 >>>> Stalled for too long without any response; will discard. >>>=20 >>> I still think this is a good change as-is and it does make checking = the >>> results of Travis CI builds easier. The issue Lars raised in [1] is = in >>> my opinion a non-issue [2] in practice and Lars hasn't yet disagreed >>> with that. >>=20 >> OK, so I simply misread the discussion and did not realize that it >> reached a conclusion? If that's the case, good ;-). Thanks. >=20 > OK, I think I now understand what happened. I misread the "fold" > discussion and thought we were still exploring the possibility, to > avoid showing uninteresting zero-status case to the users. >=20 > If we do not care about that part, then it seems that the discussion > thread is complete. Let's move on. All good with me. I just wanted explain my reasoning for the initial implementation. I do understand Szeder's reasoning too and I am OK with the change. Thanks for improving the TravisCI integration Szeder! - Lars=