git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
To: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>,
	Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
	Git mailing list <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] name-rev: use generation numbers if available
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2022 15:26:32 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <39f08f98-be0f-bba7-c41a-1c9eb6182a67@github.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+P7+xo=UwUQ422o36_8XGNWoYjROGi5wBT4=jy4ThJBs_z=Xw@mail.gmail.com>

On 3/7/2022 3:22 PM, Jacob Keller wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 5:10 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>>
>> "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@intel.com> writes:
>>
>>> Let's clarify. There are two versions of the test in this version:
>>>
>>> 1) test which enables commit graph and tests that it does the right behavior.
>>>
>>> 2) test which removes commit graph and tests that it behaves the old way.
>>>
>>>
>>> test (1) checks the flow with the commit graph enabled, and verifies that with a commit graph the new behavior is used. This test will fail if you revert the name-rev commit-graph support.
>>>
>>> test (2) always performs the way we don't like. (since we disable the commit graph and the new flow doesn't kick in) This is the test I think I will eliminate in the next revision.
>>>
>>>
>>> I will remove the 2nd test, since the first test covers the change
>>> in behavior just fine, and I think I agree we don't need to set
>>> in-stone the implementation without commit graph.
>>>
>>> I will also look at adding a test which performs a count of which
>>> revisions get inspected and makes sure that we actually are doing
>>> the optimization.
>>
>> Sounds like a sensible thing to do.
>>
>> In any case, in the current patch, #2 is not working in
>> linux-TEST-vars job at CI.  You can visit this URL
>>
>> https://github.com/git/git/runs/5400048732?check_suite_focus=true#step:4:68062
>>
>> while logged into your GitHub account for details.
> 
> Looks like this job sets all the TEST variables including
> GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH=1? The negative test passes because the commit
> graph is enforced on and we then succeed even though we were trying to
> test the negative case.
> 
> I'm going to remove that test in v3 anyways, so I don't think it is a
> big deal. However, I wonder is there some way to mark a test as
> explicitely "don't run if GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH is set"?

Typically, we try to keep them compatible in both cases. However,
you can set GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH=0 for the test, if you want. Be
careful to only change it locally to the single test, not "globally"
to the full test script.

Thanks,
-Stolee

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-07 20:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-28 21:50 [PATCH v2 0/1] name-rev: use generation numbers if available Jacob Keller
2022-02-28 21:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Jacob Keller
2022-02-28 21:50 ` [PATCH] " Jacob Keller
2022-03-01  2:36   ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-01  7:08     ` Jacob Keller
2022-03-01  7:09       ` Jacob Keller
2022-03-01  7:33       ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-01 15:09         ` Derrick Stolee
2022-03-01 19:52           ` Keller, Jacob E
2022-03-01 19:56             ` Derrick Stolee
2022-03-01 20:22               ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-01 22:46                 ` Keller, Jacob E
2022-03-03  1:10                   ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-07 20:22                     ` Jacob Keller
2022-03-07 20:26                       ` Derrick Stolee [this message]
2022-03-07 22:30                         ` Keller, Jacob E
2022-03-07 22:43                           ` Derrick Stolee
2022-03-07 22:52                           ` Junio C Hamano
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-02-28 19:07 Jacob Keller
2022-02-28 19:50 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-02-28 20:20   ` Keller, Jacob E
2022-02-28 20:24     ` Derrick Stolee
2022-02-28 20:59       ` Keller, Jacob E

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=39f08f98-be0f-bba7-c41a-1c9eb6182a67@github.com \
    --to=derrickstolee@github.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
    --cc=jacob.keller@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).