From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BB091F461 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 08:09:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726072AbfHXIJW (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Aug 2019 04:09:22 -0400 Received: from bsmtp7.bon.at ([213.33.87.19]:16620 "EHLO bsmtp7.bon.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725906AbfHXIJW (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Aug 2019 04:09:22 -0400 Received: from dx.site (unknown [93.83.142.38]) by bsmtp7.bon.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 46FrX01xrGz5tlB; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 10:09:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by dx.site (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A33F2B7; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 10:09:19 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] git-gui: Add ability to revert selected hunks and lines To: Bert Wesarg Cc: David Aguilar , Pratyush Yadav , Git Mailing List , Junio C Hamano References: <20190819214110.26461-1-me@yadavpratyush.com> <20190822220107.4153-1-me@yadavpratyush.com> <20190823234339.GA17088@gmail.com> From: Johannes Sixt Message-ID: <36714b39-dd57-a9a2-dd92-9caf7bed9039@kdbg.org> Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2019 10:09:19 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Am 24.08.19 um 08:57 schrieb Bert Wesarg: > On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 1:43 AM David Aguilar wrote: >> On the other hand, if I had to actually move my hand over to a mouse or >> trackpad and actually "click" on something then I would be super >> annoyed. That would be simply horrible with RSI in mind. >> > > I take this as a point for*not* having a confirmation dialog when > doing the action per mouse. Which matches exactly my original > implementation. I totally agree. -- Hannes