From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 821051F5AD for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 18:01:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726627AbgDGSB5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2020 14:01:57 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f66.google.com ([209.85.221.66]:39303 "EHLO mail-wr1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726332AbgDGSB5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2020 14:01:57 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f66.google.com with SMTP id p10so4929710wrt.6 for ; Tue, 07 Apr 2020 11:01:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LPjBcelSTFuFaQY0nTG/cvIRiBgjSf5sQN/qGOvLn5Y=; b=qBZZJg1itqLQlvbEbOBYud69ddKYjGYi8FisnztUZ+0Uod0nWvajCoVtL+1JHQKv+w ITDCxu9Y9I8KCy0YBoBkxHz10gaoT+4YYLvFTopmSNrVyN5dV3f9ypnG2tjVrqRTRyrx brQpTtjwc/ccsewUYLsKGvluBopbw7HAs99jKm4+uFt8YT2iknh8wom3TXa8GBlufm3f zjjY77yDFNtsw1J6oanW2XDlY/g+28TIh+zxRJBwzhdZDKvc4ZmWVjMzpHPpFIg6k3QU ZMa2va2/ycWGaodlQhK2MkJW5n8Hp7UleLNZPhUnOcLLb7u4vdKfnuwCS6PESe0d/FmM pd1A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=LPjBcelSTFuFaQY0nTG/cvIRiBgjSf5sQN/qGOvLn5Y=; b=pW+PQkhB4NLLcWE117Rs7q3vrBBReNax1boDmeIP85UbAT4e8UhPD1+6q6cEL8m3Wc FH+zSuGR7B/LG4mTDvmpqTv8/GvkhDn800FHDxqt9x3/GpdzussO9UwAKVC+zpDOoHar OE+oLzbHSNj+59x9t6+r/lpC+ujiC/XjazMlcdsicyP4e+IqfPhEL+2DqHvaXfBMo/SG qB/hu7WphS4HiiFJomXEg2FJAt5fsrCWIvmxfcF3v1oyJ13/txKxRorPivoh+JXmP/Lr HWo3SVAtPIYU1Cguk+opr8+bvS1wwKxRqdZUPqmcMFsy4XPcx0nhl18WDNC84mERLNY/ OPlQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuY91p1NoUeapXXYm/S0kQFxvAdrrg3p+A+9QmVclDZPMn8zGOe1 Q8ywGMiUAtwhDWX9drjCG5ITj5wp X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJ+QXLkE1qjoIdRlCHyIlN3pwNXeIfRqFNY16kBnRsh0wRQRxt/G7pHNjGsfYxepdYlhT1VPA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4e09:: with SMTP id p9mr3767855wrt.376.1586282484767; Tue, 07 Apr 2020 11:01:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.201] (85.25.198.146.dyn.plus.net. [146.198.25.85]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id n6sm3437199wmn.10.2020.04.07.11.01.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Apr 2020 11:01:24 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Revert "Revert "Merge branch 'ra/rebase-i-more-options'"" To: Elijah Newren , Phillip Wood Cc: Git Mailing List , Johannes Schindelin , Junio C Hamano , Rohit Ashiwal , Jonathan Nieder References: <20200407141125.30872-1-phillip.wood123@gmail.com> <20200407141125.30872-2-phillip.wood123@gmail.com> From: Phillip Wood Message-ID: <35d165ec-1e19-1000-c8ec-7273ed6c98ce@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 19:01:21 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hi Elijah On 07/04/2020 16:16, Elijah Newren wrote: > On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 7:11 AM Phillip Wood wrote: >> >> From: Phillip Wood >> >> This reverts commit 4d924528d8bfe947abfc54ee9bd3892ab509c8cd. >> >> This is being reverted to enable some fixups for >> ra/rebase-i-more-options to be built on this commit. > > This makes sense to me, but it will be only the second 'Revert > "Revert..."' commit in all of git.git and I'm curious if Junio will be > unhappy with it. I wasn't sure what to do for the best, this seemed to be reasonable (originally I just based the patches on top of ra/rebase-i-more-options but then they would be a pain to merge into pu because of the revert) but if Junio has other ideas I'm happy to re-roll Thanks for taking a look at this series Phillip >> --- >> Documentation/git-rebase.txt | 27 ++++- >> builtin/rebase.c | 49 ++++++-- >> sequencer.c | 141 ++++++++++++++++++++++-- >> sequencer.h | 2 + >> t/t3422-rebase-incompatible-options.sh | 2 - >> t/t3433-rebase-options-compatibility.sh | 131 ++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 7 files changed, 327 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) >> create mode 100755 t/t3433-rebase-options-compatibility.sh >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/git-rebase.txt b/Documentation/git-rebase.txt >> index 0c4f038dd6..1d0e2d27cc 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/git-rebase.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/git-rebase.txt >> @@ -393,16 +393,31 @@ your branch contains commits which were dropped, this option can be used >> with `--keep-base` in order to drop those commits from your branch. >> >> --ignore-whitespace:: >> + Behaves differently depending on which backend is selected. >> ++ >> +'am' backend: When applying a patch, ignore changes in whitespace in >> +context lines if necessary. >> ++ >> +'interactive' backend: Treat lines with only whitespace changes as >> +unchanged for the sake of a three-way merge. >> + >> --whitespace=