From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C7DD208DB for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 20:56:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751249AbdH1U4w (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Aug 2017 16:56:52 -0400 Received: from siwi.pair.com ([209.68.5.199]:42375 "EHLO siwi.pair.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751182AbdH1U4w (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Aug 2017 16:56:52 -0400 Received: from siwi.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by siwi.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 863058457D; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 16:56:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [10.160.98.77] (unknown [167.220.148.86]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by siwi.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 238228457C; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 16:56:51 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Some ThreadSanitizer-results To: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_=c3=85gren?= Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Torsten_B=c3=b6gershausen?= , Johannes Sixt , Junio C Hamano , Jeff King , Stefan Beller References: From: Jeff Hostetler Message-ID: <35ca4125-baed-c54b-7478-7531066daa0a@jeffhostetler.com> Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 16:56:50 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On 8/21/2017 1:43 PM, Martin Ă…gren wrote: > This is the second version of my series to try to address some issues > ... > 2) hashmap_add, which I could try my hands on if Jeff doesn't beat me to > it -- his proposed change should fix it and I doubt I could come up with > anything "better", considering he knows the code. Now that I'm back from vacation, let me take another stab at this. Jeff