From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HK_RANDOM_FROM, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF9E51F462 for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 20:50:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726537AbfFEUuM (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jun 2019 16:50:12 -0400 Received: from smtp-o-2.desy.de ([131.169.56.155]:48085 "EHLO smtp-o-2.desy.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726477AbfFEUuL (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jun 2019 16:50:11 -0400 Received: from smtp-buf-2.desy.de (smtp-buf-2.desy.de [IPv6:2001:638:700:1038::1:a5]) by smtp-o-2.desy.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C767B160511 for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 22:50:09 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp-o-2.desy.de C767B160511 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=desy.de; s=default; t=1559767809; bh=QFnrfwgds4xqwQ1j8aFggr7vjc62prwU0X1P213p0zY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From; b=PBuCLMycJCkOCEQWl8JHpv71mN4WGVPQw7DCTmsUD2qnQGv4IV0T3ZVoBO56h4HuG ogEMWKiWEqjQLBvr8m7bif/FiRh0k3ZYMDeRPiX2o/1LI4Px25sWs4LYabaBSj+MzL eSSUNLZCs1ZJ8gtK38AnSZSbUn5WMaEYAcVrLnP4= Received: from smtp-m-2.desy.de (smtp-m-2.desy.de [131.169.56.130]) by smtp-buf-2.desy.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C02391A00B8; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 22:50:09 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at desy.de Received: from z-mbx-2.desy.de (z-mbx-2.desy.de [131.169.55.140]) by smtp-intra-1.desy.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 922C0C003B; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 22:50:09 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 22:50:09 +0200 (CEST) From: "Mkrtchyan, Tigran" To: Junio C Hamano Cc: git , Jonathan Nieder , Johannes Schindelin Message-ID: <327924049.10494298.1559767809461.JavaMail.zimbra@desy.de> In-Reply-To: References: <139144069.10140489.1559664262817.JavaMail.zimbra@desy.de> <20190605155300.26506-1-tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de> <1933659713.10490718.1559765529240.JavaMail.zimbra@desy.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] tag: add tag.gpgSign config option to force all tags be GPG-signed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.10_GA_3781 (ZimbraWebClient - FF67 (Linux)/8.8.10_GA_3786) Thread-Topic: add tag.gpgSign config option to force all tags be GPG-signed Thread-Index: uNIIUhQ+leSAp9TtJtpWMreifOcOeA== Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Thanks for clarification. I will update the patch and re-send it. Tigran. ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Junio C Hamano" > To: "Tigran Mkrtchyan" > Cc: "git" , "Jonathan Nieder" , "Johannes Schindelin" > > Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2019 10:46:05 PM > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] tag: add tag.gpgSign config option to force all tags be GPG-signed > "Mkrtchyan, Tigran" writes: > >>> But more importantly, I think we should justify why this "not >>> allowed" makes sense as the design of the feature. A plausible >>> alternative design would simply follow the "last one wins" paradigm, >>> ... >> This is matter of convention. > > Oh, if you put it that way, it is quite clear that we should redo > this part, as the rest of Git command line processing all pretty > much follow "last one wins". I was mostly curious if there was any > strong reason why this combination has to be different.