git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Jeff Hostetler <git@jeffhostetler.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, avarab@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] multi-pack-index: fix verify on large repos
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 13:18:20 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2eaa3617-326d-4f26-6bc0-7192a12ab192@jeffhostetler.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqy357pizb.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>



On 3/22/2019 1:37 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> Teach "multi-pack-index verify" to handle cases where the number of
>> packfiles exceeds the open file handle limit.
>>
>> The first commit fixes a problem that prevented the LRU-style
>> close_one_pack() mechanism from working which caused midx verify to run out
>> of file descriptors.
>>
>> The second commit teaches midx verify to sort the set of objects to verify
>> by packfile rather than verifying them in OID order. This eliminates the
>> need to have more than one packfile/idx open at the same time.
>>
>> With the second commit, runtime on 3600 packfiles went from 12 minutes to 25
>> seconds.
> 
> These reference to the first and second commit might have become
> stale across interations, but logically it makes sense---the first
> point is about correctness (i.e. do not die by running out of fds)
> and the second one is about usable-performance.
> 
> But in this round (possibly in the previous one, too?) the "group
> objects by packfile" one addresses both points?
> 


Sorry, I forgot to remote the stale content in the cover letter for
the V3 version.

This version just has the sorting by packfile commit and because it only
keeps 1 packfile open at a time, it does not need the change to add 
packfiles to the packed-git list because it does not trigger the
close_one_pack() problem.

We suspect there are other places (not-yet-observed) where the design of
the all-packs and packed-git lists will lead to similar fd exhaustion
errors and want to fix it properly in the packfile and/or midx code.
We'll address this potential problem in a future patch series.

Jeff

      reply	other threads:[~2019-03-25 17:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-18 14:29 [PATCH 0/3] multi-pack-index: fix verify on large repos Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget
2019-03-18 14:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] midx: verify: group objects by packfile to speed up object verification Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget
2019-03-18 15:53   ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2019-03-18 21:39     ` Jeff Hostetler
2019-03-18 22:02       ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2019-03-19  4:08         ` Junio C Hamano
2019-03-19 14:00         ` Jeff Hostetler
2019-03-19 14:06           ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2019-03-18 14:29 ` [PATCH 1/3] midx: verify: add midx packfiles to the packed_git list Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget
2019-03-18 14:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] trace2:data: add trace2 data to midx Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget
2019-03-19 14:37 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] multi-pack-index: fix verify on large repos Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget
2019-03-19 14:37   ` [PATCH v2 1/4] progress: add sparse mode to force 100% complete message Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget
2019-03-19 16:42     ` Eric Sunshine
2019-03-19 18:33       ` Jeff Hostetler
2019-03-19 18:46         ` Eric Sunshine
2019-03-19 14:37   ` [PATCH v2 2/4] trace2:data: add trace2 data to midx Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget
2019-03-19 14:37   ` [PATCH v2 3/4] midx: verify: add midx packfiles to the packed_git list Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget
2019-03-19 19:53     ` Jeff Hostetler
2019-03-19 14:37   ` [PATCH v2 4/4] midx: verify: group objects by packfile to speed up object verification Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget
2019-03-21 19:36   ` [PATCH v3 0/4] multi-pack-index: fix verify on large repos Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget
2019-03-21 19:36     ` [PATCH v3 1/4] progress: add sparse mode to force 100% complete message Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget
2019-03-21 19:36     ` [PATCH v3 2/4] trace2:data: add trace2 data to midx Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget
2019-03-21 19:36     ` [PATCH v3 3/4] midx: add progress indicators in multi-pack-index verify Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget
2019-03-21 19:36     ` [PATCH v3 4/4] midx: during verify group objects by packfile to speed verification Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget
2019-03-22  5:37     ` [PATCH v3 0/4] multi-pack-index: fix verify on large repos Junio C Hamano
2019-03-25 17:18       ` Jeff Hostetler [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2eaa3617-326d-4f26-6bc0-7192a12ab192@jeffhostetler.com \
    --to=git@jeffhostetler.com \
    --cc=avarab@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).