git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@univ-lyon1.fr>
To: Jonathan Bressat <git.jonathan.bressat@gmail.com>
Cc: "cogoni.guillaume@gmail.com" <cogoni.guillaume@gmail.com>,
	"git@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	"gitster@pobox.com" <gitster@pobox.com>,
	"guillaume.cogoni@gmail.com" <guillaume.cogoni@gmail.com>,
	BRESSAT JONATHAN p1802864 <jonathan.bressat@etu.univ-lyon1.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] t6436: tests how merge behave when there is untracked file with the same content
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2022 11:44:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2c6ee145-5116-25db-9fbf-bcffe67a9360@univ-lyon1.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dfea1d98c15047428b1a11adbc002eef@SAMBXP02.univ-lyon1.fr>

On 5/27/22 21:55, Jonathan Bressat wrote:
> add test to show explicitly that merge doesn't overwrite untracked files
> or unstaged even when they have the same content than files int the
> merged commit

Nit: capital at the beginning of the sentence, period at the end.

"untracked files or unstaged" -> "untracked or unstaged files"

> +test_expect_success 'create branch A' '
> +	git reset --hard c0 &&
> +	git checkout -b A
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success 'fastforward will not overwrite untracked file with the same content' '

Git usually spells fast-forward with a hyphen, not fastforward.

> +	test_when_finished "git branch -D B && git reset --hard c0 && git clean --force" &&
> +	git checkout -b B &&
> +	test_commit --no-tag "tracked" file "content" &&
> +	git checkout A &&
> +	echo content >file &&
> +	test_must_fail git merge B

Other tests in the same file test a bit more: the file mustn't be 
touched. It's a very important thing with Git: 99% of the times, when an 
operation fails, it fails before starting any change on-disk, as opposed 
to "I started messing up with your repo, I can't go further, go fix the 
mess yourself" ;-).

The way it's done is by creating a file with the content, using "cp" 
instead of "echo >" and "test_cmp" to check the content.

Other tests also check the absence of .git/MERGE_HEAD, which seems to be 
a sensible thing to do.

> +test_expect_success 'will not overwrite untracked file with the same content' '
> +	test_when_finished "git branch -D B && git reset --hard c0 && git clean --force" &&
> +	git checkout -b B &&
> +	test_commit --no-tag "tracked" file "content" fileB "content" &&
> +	git checkout A &&
> +	test_commit --no-tag "exA" fileA "content" &&
> +	echo content >file &&
> +	test_must_fail git merge B
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success 'will not overwrite unstaged file with the same content' '
> +	test_when_finished "git branch -D B && git reset --hard c0 && git clean --force" &&
> +	test_commit --no-tag "unstaged" file "other" &&
> +	git checkout -b B &&
> +	test_commit --no-tag "staged" file "content" &&
> +	git checkout A &&
> +	echo content >file &&
> +	test_must_fail git merge B
> +'

As discussed IRL, I think two more cases should be tested:

- index matches commit being merged, but the worktree file doesn't
- worktree file doesn't match content, but index does

in both cases, I'd expect the old and the new behavior to abort the 
merge. Perhaps there are use-cases where one would expect a successful 
merge silently, but for rare corner-cases, it's safe to ask the user to 
fix the situation manually and too much magic can only confuse the user.

-- 
Matthieu Moy
https://matthieu-moy.fr/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-06-04  9:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-27 15:41 [WIP]: make merge nicer to the user Guillaume Cogoni
2022-04-12 19:15 ` [PATCH 0/1] Be nicer to the user on tracked/untracked merge conflicts Jonathan
2022-04-12 19:15   ` [PATCH 1/1] Merge with untracked file that are the same without failure and test Jonathan
2022-04-12 19:21     ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-04-13 18:18     ` Junio C Hamano
2022-04-25 20:27       ` [PATCH v1 0/2] Be nicer to the user on tracked/untracked merge conflicts Jonathan
2022-04-25 20:27         ` [PATCH v1 1/2] t7615: test how merge behave when there is untracked file Jonathan
2022-04-25 20:27         ` [PATCH v1 2/2] merge with untracked file that are the same without failure Jonathan
2022-04-25 21:16         ` [PATCH v1 0/2] Be nicer to the user on tracked/untracked merge conflicts Junio C Hamano
2022-04-25 22:28           ` Guillaume Cogoni
2022-04-25 23:10             ` Junio C Hamano
     [not found]           ` <fdd9f13d14e942f3a1572866761b9580@SAMBXP02.univ-lyon1.fr>
2022-04-26  6:38             ` Matthieu Moy
2022-04-26 16:13               ` Junio C Hamano
2022-04-28 10:33                 ` Jonathan Bressat
2022-05-27 19:55                   ` [PATCH v2 0/4] " Jonathan Bressat
2022-05-27 19:55                     ` [PATCH v2 1/4] t6436: tests how merge behave when there is untracked file with the same content Jonathan Bressat
2022-05-27 19:55                     ` [PATCH v2 2/4] merge with untracked file that are the same without failure Jonathan Bressat
2022-05-27 19:55                     ` [PATCH v2 3/4] add configuration variable corresponding to --overwrite-same-content Jonathan Bressat
2022-05-27 19:55                     ` [PATCH v2 4/4] error message now advice to use the new option Jonathan Bressat
     [not found]                     ` <dfea1d98c15047428b1a11adbc002eef@SAMBXP02.univ-lyon1.fr>
2022-06-04  9:44                       ` Matthieu Moy [this message]
     [not found]                     ` <be2297bdcd724c3f8abfde2d5d74fb18@SAMBXP02.univ-lyon1.fr>
2022-06-04  9:45                       ` [PATCH v2 2/4] merge with untracked file that are the same without failure Matthieu Moy
     [not found]                     ` <82beb916d9c44a069f30ec4ff261e3be@SAMBXP02.univ-lyon1.fr>
2022-06-04  9:45                       ` [PATCH v2 4/4] error message now advice to use the new option Matthieu Moy
2022-06-10 12:58                         ` Guillaume Cogoni
     [not found]                     ` <4efbe7d9c95841c691f51954670a1d9f@SAMBXP02.univ-lyon1.fr>
2022-06-04  9:49                       ` [PATCH v2 3/4] add configuration variable corresponding to --overwrite-same-content Matthieu Moy
     [not found]         ` <eca66375d8b34154856b7da303bf96d7@SAMBXP02.univ-lyon1.fr>
2022-04-26  6:48           ` [PATCH v1 1/2] t7615: test how merge behave when there is untracked file Matthieu Moy
2022-04-12 19:24   ` [PATCH 0/1] Be nicer to the user on tracked/untracked merge conflicts Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-04-14  8:57     ` Jonathan Bressat

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2c6ee145-5116-25db-9fbf-bcffe67a9360@univ-lyon1.fr \
    --to=matthieu.moy@univ-lyon1.fr \
    --cc=cogoni.guillaume@gmail.com \
    --cc=git.jonathan.bressat@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=guillaume.cogoni@gmail.com \
    --cc=jonathan.bressat@etu.univ-lyon1.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).