git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Andreas Heiduk <asheiduk@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] add [--] to usage of filter-branch
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 16:33:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <243a8308-6696-1494-49e9-ccd01acfaa46@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqk24l717a.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>

Am 09.06.2017 um 15:14 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
> Andreas Heiduk <asheiduk@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> Am 03.06.2017 um 12:17 schrieb Andreas Heiduk:
>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Heiduk <asheiduk@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>  Documentation/git-filter-branch.txt | 3 ++-
>>>  git-filter-branch.sh                | 2 +-
>>>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/git-filter-branch.txt b/Documentation/git-filter-branch.txt
>>> index 45c849d8c..1efdda804 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/git-filter-branch.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/git-filter-branch.txt
>>> @@ -86,7 +86,8 @@ OPTIONS
>>>  	This is not a real filter executed for each commit but a one
>>>  	time setup just before the loop. Therefore no commit-specific
>>>  	variables are defined yet.  Functions or variables defined here
>>> -	can be used or modified in the following filter steps.
>>> +	can be used or modified in the following filter steps except
>>> +	the commit filter, for technical reasons.
>>
>> I'll move that into the previous commit.
> 
> Yeah, the description of "technical limitation" is different from
> clarifying the disambiguating "--" in the documentation.
> 
> I am curious what the "technical reason" really is, though ;-)
> 

Well, I just picked up the wording from the "Filter" section a 
couple paragraphs above:

> The filters are applied in the order as listed below.  The <command>
> argument is always evaluated in the shell context using the 'eval' command
> (with the notable exception of the commit filter, for technical reasons).

Because these reasons exist independently from my change I think I
can get away with just that snappy reference :-]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-09 14:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-03 10:17 [PATCH 1/2] add setup step to filter-branch Andreas Heiduk
2017-06-03 10:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] add [--] to usage of filter-branch Andreas Heiduk
2017-06-05  8:51   ` Andreas Heiduk
2017-06-09 13:14     ` Junio C Hamano
2017-06-09 14:33       ` Andreas Heiduk [this message]
2017-06-05  2:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] add setup step to filter-branch Junio C Hamano
2017-06-09  5:49   ` Jeff King
2017-06-09 13:11     ` Junio C Hamano
2017-06-10  8:54 ` [PATCH v2 " Andreas Heiduk
2017-06-10  8:54   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] add [--] to usage of filter-branch Andreas Heiduk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=243a8308-6696-1494-49e9-ccd01acfaa46@gmail.com \
    --to=asheiduk@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).