From: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
To: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, peff@peff.net, vdye@github.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] bundle-uri: drop unused 'uri' parameter
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 21:50:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <221220.86fsd9wzpb.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <be44ef00-2d80-18d5-4dab-357faca20853@github.com>
On Tue, Dec 20 2022, Derrick Stolee wrote:
> On 12/19/22 7:49 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> I think these three patches were designed to be "oops, that was
>> wrong and here is a band-aid" follow-up fixes on top of what was
>> back then in 'next'. Now the base topic has been kicked out of
>> 'next' together with these, we can afford to roll them into the base
>> series before merging it back to 'next', but due to things generally
>> being slow toward the end of the year, that hasn't happened yet.
>
> I wasn't expecting to re-roll the base topic, but I'll get
> started on that now.
>
> However, the comments in this review are barely actionable.
Skimming over my comments again the actionable bits are:
* 1/3: Commit says it's removing an unused param, also has while-at-it
typo fix, maybe split that up?
* 1/3: Commit says <same>, has while-at-it removal of documenting what
a function's return value means, maybe keep that?
* 1/3: Commit says <same>, has seeming while-at-it discussion of what
another parameter is expected to contain (you replied saying they
were related)
* 2/3: Question about whether reading "r" v.s. "the_repository" has an
observable behavior change. If yes let's add a test, if no let's note
"it's for good measure".
* 3/3: A question about whether we really didn't need
GIT_TEST_BUNDLE_URI. You managed to convince me that no, we don't
* 3/3: Question about what the 2nd paragraph of the commit message is
trying to convey (you didn't reply to this bit). The actionable thing
would be to clarify it, or remove it.
> They provide very little value especially for how verbose they are.
I agree that this was all of relatively little value, these are all
rather trivial patches after all, and the bundle-uri feature is opt-in
and WIP at this point.
But even trivial patches can be helped along by review. I'm just trying
to help this topic land & show Junio that others have reviewed this
carefully.
I agree that my E-Mails are verbose, sorry. This isn't my native
language, it's a balancing act between trying to be unambiguously
understood, and verbosity. sorry.
> frustrated to see such a drive-by review so late in the process.
This I'm confused by. You submitted this ~1 week ago on the 12th, Junio
rewound the parent topic out of "next" on the 14th.
Isn't this the appropriate time to comment on both this topic & its
parent?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-20 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-12 17:33 [PATCH 0/3] Bundle URIs 4.5: fixups from part IV Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-12-12 17:33 ` [PATCH 1/3] bundle-uri: drop unused 'uri' parameter Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-12-19 10:57 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-12-20 0:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-12-20 14:02 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-12-20 20:50 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [this message]
2022-12-20 13:57 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-12-20 20:46 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-12-12 17:33 ` [PATCH 2/3] bundle-uri: advertise based on repo config Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-12-19 11:04 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-12-20 13:54 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-12-12 17:33 ` [PATCH 3/3] bundle-uri: remove GIT_TEST_BUNDLE_URI env variable Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-12-19 11:09 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-12-20 13:51 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-12-20 20:41 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-12-12 18:07 ` [PATCH 0/3] Bundle URIs 4.5: fixups from part IV Victoria Dye
2022-12-12 20:59 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=221220.86fsd9wzpb.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com \
--to=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=derrickstolee@github.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=vdye@github.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).