From: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
To: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Avoid using deprecated features in Git's GitHub workflows
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2022 23:42:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <221207.86r0xa9618.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.1440.git.1670423680.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
On Wed, Dec 07 2022, Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget wrote:
> I waited for quite a while with submitting this because I did not want to
> interfere with patch series that are in flight, but it seems that this was
> unwise, as there is now a patch floating about (ab/ci-retire-set-output)
> that partially fulfills this here patch series' purpose. However, these
> patches are more complete, so I proposed to supersede that patch with this
> more comprehensive solution.
What does "more complete" here mean? Just that this series is doing more
things than stand-alone patches?
> This patch series is based on od/ci-use-checkout-v3-when-applicable.
>
> Johannes Schindelin (4):
> ci: use a newer `github-script` version
Is this the patch that needs or interacts with
od/ci-use-checkout-v3-when-applicable?
I don't see it in "What's Cooking", but "seen" currently has
"gitster/js/ci-set-output", which looks to be from
[1]
> ci: avoid deprecated `set-output` workflow command
This is byte-for-byte the same as the second hunk in my [2].
> ci: avoid using deprecated {up,down}load-artifacts Action
Most of this looks good & doesn't duplicate any existing patch, but why
is there a change in there that disables the uploading of failed test
directories for the "linux32" job?
> ci(l10n): avoid using the deprecated `set-output` workflow command
This does the same as the first hunk in my [2], you're just using two
"echo", I used a here-doc.
I think what would make it valuable to bundle these up is if doing so
would resolve some tricky interference between these patches.
But I don't see that that's the case, and we can e.g. start writing to
"$GITHUB_OUTPUT" independent of other changes.
1. https://lore.kernel.org/git/pull.1387.git.1667902408921.gitgitgadget@gmail.com/
2. https://lore.kernel.org/git/patch-v2-1.1-4e7db0db3be-20221207T014848Z-avarab@gmail.com/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-07 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-07 14:34 [PATCH 0/4] Avoid using deprecated features in Git's GitHub workflows Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-12-07 14:34 ` [PATCH 1/4] ci: use a newer `github-script` version Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-12-07 22:22 ` Taylor Blau
2022-12-07 14:34 ` [PATCH 2/4] ci: avoid deprecated `set-output` workflow command Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-12-07 22:24 ` Taylor Blau
2022-12-07 14:34 ` [PATCH 3/4] ci: avoid using deprecated {up,down}load-artifacts Action Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-12-07 14:34 ` [PATCH 4/4] ci(l10n): avoid using the deprecated `set-output` workflow command Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-12-07 22:40 ` [PATCH 0/4] Avoid using deprecated features in Git's GitHub workflows Taylor Blau
2022-12-07 23:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-12-08 5:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-12-07 22:42 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=221207.86r0xa9618.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com \
--to=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).