From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271FF1F910 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 15:53:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Q3gnLGdt"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231494AbiKAPxq (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2022 11:53:46 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35572 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231282AbiKAPxo (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2022 11:53:44 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x635.google.com (mail-ej1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::635]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2239DC4E for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 08:53:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x635.google.com with SMTP id y14so38116763ejd.9 for ; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 08:53:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:user-agent:references:date :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=RWuiiBPKVjCfXht0pdY1UzDc2bCNiPeejs6FMFT8jiU=; b=Q3gnLGdtTRj6pTLD/TU8PiFNNgfuZN1oO7F+sEtSWBfHLJAPysWfAMZSUQSsS/lc0J 8snBbpHqlJGsdqYp2EPuvU61ZGoywfQm0FFsbZL+/Mh5/Z3oldJB0NLFe330oODaXaYm buBbFZGWaWe2VgpPVaUihulc+NOB503iSrenYD/58naVEDaSHOkBce10hMUbxSwCKLwv NG0amdGCceGw4FtO9P8Paah5o2rGLCauZ1w3wrpfwRLPqKqmnlowSgxVOwZ4y7/32ZyL oITSoAYKNWC/85CS1zQo+5RhAY13NUihmN82lovQYQ9cdDuUoQaAep10m6+9eVR39+5G kZQQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:user-agent:references:date :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=RWuiiBPKVjCfXht0pdY1UzDc2bCNiPeejs6FMFT8jiU=; b=rX5p5ENcg4a/3IoeDdPMG8NQaMfxH4hrYHLu8EfjyXqQFEPmBBO6bWyf5matqCQHUy WpgPyhYFCDedcEJQGv+NuIKyFHmDK0HIawAqi7uKyjSG3pdN69dpCyhzrZ/NLRGkeuku X9ssxBonTvGj26sUk2O5YCra4Gi52xAxyXaKrWcjT79wLOx94cRwNgVwdeBfE86rJzkz nXu5ls7vShbNMekBXswl8HZ3QRFcm6NBcDtYoXY+yvIYmN0QeCjt0bJSsrQJHl+0uNjt RtaJz4RrTLjCDeANhY12qBG3dN2ZRTo41CbpMIt+XXhWqaI7zG1bEiYeFpT1CPKVGmwh kgeQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0k+IKdBrOz+9DaKF71rU3GGW+gOFQ5U/yHSUy1xyQY10tgf9UD uwUk6eELDck2Xp+37K1D8k8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7X0OfOEvf1+dehWdjKfXyeFMWfsRsjcdMASnJYFB24fgNPpOxZicNE63+HfBjgdor/QSVR+w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:dac3:b0:780:a242:2f14 with SMTP id xi3-20020a170906dac300b00780a2422f14mr18572625ejb.668.1667318022466; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 08:53:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmgdl (dhcp-077-248-183-071.chello.nl. [77.248.183.71]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ec38-20020a0564020d6600b004614fd33789sm4587576edb.18.2022.11.01.08.53.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 01 Nov 2022 08:53:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from avar by gmgdl with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1opta9-00BOWZ-1g; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 16:53:41 +0100 From: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason To: Erik Cervin Edin Cc: Mark Hills , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Consist timestamps within a checkout/clone Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2022 16:53:30 +0100 References: <2210311614160.25661@stax.localdomain> User-agent: Debian GNU/Linux bookworm/sid; Emacs 27.1; mu4e 1.9.0 In-reply-to: Message-ID: <221101.86fsf24qnu.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 01 2022, Erik Cervin Edin wrote: > I have little to add on the underlying issue or non-issue but some > ideas on how to solve your problem > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 8:39 PM Mark Hills wrote: >> >> ... >> Indeed, Make is acting reasonably as the source file is sometimes >> marginally newer than the destination (both checked out by Git), example >> below. >> >> I've never had to consider consistency timestamps within a Git checkout >> until now. >> >> It's entirely possible there's _never_ a guarantee of consistency here. > > If your makefile depends on checkout, why not > git ls-files | xargs touch > or if this done in an environment where there's not a fresh clone each > time, maybe > git diff HEAD --name-only --diff-filter=AM | xargs touch > or something along those lines I believe you might be trying to re-invent "make -B" :)