git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
To: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Cc: Teng Long <dyroneteng@gmail.com>,
	gitster@pobox.com, derrickstolee@github.com, git@vger.kernel.org,
	tenglong.tl@alibaba-inc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] pack-bitmap.c: avoid exposing absolute paths
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 01:19:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <221027.86czaeb1xt.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y1mp23NHB0qzKsPR@nand.local>


On Wed, Oct 26 2022, Taylor Blau wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 10:48:03AM +0800, Teng Long wrote:
>> > If the "ignoring extra" is a totally expected situation (e.g. it is
>> > not suprising if we always ignore the bitmapfile in the alternate
>> > when we have our own), perhaps we should squelch the warning in such
>> > expected cases altogether (while warning other cases where we see
>> > more bitmap files than we expect to see, which may be an anomaly
>> > worth warning about), and that may be an improvement worth spending
>> > development cycles on, but I am not sure about this one.
>>
>> That's exactly good suggestion. In my opinion, I think to avoid the sensitive
>> warning and the same time we keep some information to let the users know "Oh,
>> there are some extra existing bitmaps we just ignored then maybe can do some
>> optimization works", but I think just remove the total warning here is
>> reasonable also, i'm good with it.
>
> I think that it is somewhat of a step backwards to remove it entirely,
> but let me qualify that a little bit.
>
> At GitHub, we actually *do* remove this warning entirely:

You at GitHub also added it entirely :) => fff42755efc (pack-bitmap: add
support for bitmap indexes, 2013-12-21).

Anyway, I'm fine with removing it. From skimming that commit it was
probably added for no particularly strong reason. But I found the
omission of "it was added in xyz commit" to be sometihng that could be
added to the commit message in this case, and....

> You could also imagine adding a configuration knob here to control
> whether or not the warning is shown, but I find that to be kind of
> gross.

FWIW I don't find that to be particularly gross. I think it's fine to
just delete it.

But isn't this a general sign that we should perhaps have different
output when "pack-objects" and the like is run "locally", v.s. when
we're running via some server process, and end up spewing a message out
that the user can't do anything about?


  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-26 23:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-26  7:09 [PATCH 0/1] pack-bitmap.c: avoid exposing absolute paths Teng Long
2022-08-26  7:09 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Teng Long
2022-08-26 16:34 ` [PATCH 0/1] " Junio C Hamano
2022-08-29  2:48   ` Teng Long
2022-10-26 21:42     ` Taylor Blau
2022-10-26 23:19       ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [this message]
2022-10-31 13:20         ` Teng Long
2022-10-27 20:45       ` Jeff King
2022-10-30 18:42         ` Taylor Blau
2022-10-31 12:22           ` [PATCH 0/1] pack-bitmap.c: avoid exposing absolute paths Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> writes: Teng Long
2022-11-02  5:37         ` [PATCH 0/1] pack-bitmap.c: avoid exposing absolute paths Teng Long
2022-11-02  7:54           ` Jeff King
2022-11-02 13:52             ` Teng Long
2022-10-31 13:13       ` Teng Long
2022-11-03  1:00         ` Taylor Blau
2022-11-02  9:20 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-11-02 13:04   ` Teng Long
2022-11-02 12:56 ` [PATCH v2 " Teng Long
2022-11-02 12:56   ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Teng Long
2022-11-03  1:16     ` Taylor Blau
2022-11-03  9:35       ` Teng Long
2022-11-05  0:35         ` Taylor Blau
2022-11-03  1:21   ` [PATCH v2 0/1] " Taylor Blau
2022-11-03  8:42     ` Teng Long
2022-11-04  3:17   ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Teng Long
2022-11-04  3:17     ` [PATCH v3 1/2] " Teng Long
2022-11-04 22:11       ` Taylor Blau
2022-11-04  3:17     ` [PATCH v3 2/2] pack-bitmap.c: remove unnecessary "open_pack_index()" calls Teng Long
2022-11-04 22:09       ` Taylor Blau
2022-11-04 22:13     ` [PATCH v3 0/2] pack-bitmap.c: avoid exposing absolute paths Taylor Blau
2022-11-10  7:10     ` Teng Long
2022-11-10  7:10       ` [PATCH v3 1/2] pack-bitmap.c: remove unnecessary "open_pack_index()" calls Teng Long
2022-11-14 22:03         ` Jeff King
2022-11-14 22:14           ` Taylor Blau
2022-11-14 22:31             ` Jeff King
2022-11-14 22:50               ` Taylor Blau
2022-11-10  7:10       ` [PATCH v3 2/2] pack-bitmap.c: avoid exposing absolute paths Teng Long
2022-11-11 22:26       ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Taylor Blau
2022-11-14 22:23         ` Jeff King
2022-11-17 14:19           ` Teng Long
2022-11-17 15:03             ` Jeff King
2022-11-17 21:57               ` Taylor Blau
2022-11-21  3:27                 ` Teng Long
2022-11-21 12:16     ` [PATCH v4 0/4] " Teng Long
2022-11-21 12:16       ` [PATCH v4 1/4] pack-bitmap.c: remove unnecessary "open_pack_index()" calls Teng Long
2022-11-21 12:16       ` [PATCH v4 2/4] pack-bitmap.c: avoid exposing absolute paths Teng Long
2022-11-21 12:16       ` [PATCH v4 3/4] pack-bitmap.c: break out of the bitmap loop early if not tracing Teng Long
2022-11-21 23:27         ` Junio C Hamano
2022-11-28 13:09           ` Teng Long
2022-11-21 12:16       ` [PATCH v4 4/4] pack-bitmap.c: trace bitmap ignore logs when midx-bitmap is found Teng Long
2022-11-21 19:09         ` Jeff King
2022-11-21 23:29           ` Junio C Hamano
2022-11-28 12:29             ` Teng Long
2022-11-28 12:37           ` Teng Long
2022-11-29  1:27             ` Jeff King
2022-11-29 13:14               ` Teng Long
2022-11-21 19:04       ` [PATCH v4 0/4] pack-bitmap.c: avoid exposing absolute paths Jeff King
2022-11-28 12:48         ` Teng Long
2022-11-28 14:09       ` [PATCH v5 " Teng Long
2022-11-28 14:09         ` [PATCH v5 1/4] pack-bitmap.c: remove unnecessary "open_pack_index()" calls Teng Long
2022-11-28 14:09         ` [PATCH v5 2/4] pack-bitmap.c: avoid exposing absolute paths Teng Long
2022-11-28 14:09         ` [PATCH v5 3/4] pack-bitmap.c: break out of the bitmap loop early if not tracing Teng Long
2022-11-28 23:26           ` Taylor Blau
2022-11-29 13:17             ` Teng Long
2022-11-28 14:09         ` [PATCH v5 4/4] pack-bitmap.c: trace bitmap ignore logs when midx-bitmap is found Teng Long
2022-11-28 23:30         ` [PATCH v5 0/4] pack-bitmap.c: avoid exposing absolute paths Taylor Blau
2022-11-29 13:21           ` Teng Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=221027.86czaeb1xt.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com \
    --to=avarab@gmail.com \
    --cc=derrickstolee@github.com \
    --cc=dyroneteng@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
    --cc=tenglong.tl@alibaba-inc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).