git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] http.c: avoid danging pointer to local variable `finished`
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 23:45:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <220524.865yluvby1.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2205242309160.352@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>


On Tue, May 24 2022, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

> Hi Junio,
>
> On Tue, 24 May 2022, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> The "clear slot->finished", by the way, is what I think is the right
>> thing to do, especially that the objective is to squelch the false
>> positive warning from a new compiler.  If there is a way to annotate
>> the line for the compiler to tell it not to warn about it, that would
>> have been even better.
>
> We could do something like this:
>
> -- snip --
> diff --git a/http.c b/http.c
> index b08795715f8a..2ac8d51d3668 100644
> --- a/http.c
> +++ b/http.c
> @@ -1365,7 +1365,14 @@ void run_active_slot(struct active_request_slot *slot)
>  	struct timeval select_timeout;
>  	int finished = 0;
>
> +#if __GNUC__ >= 12
> +#pragma GCC diagnostic push
> +#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wdangling-pointer"
> +#endif
>  	slot->finished = &finished;
> +#if __GNUC__ >= 12
> +#pragma GCC diagnostic pop
> +#endif
>  	while (!finished) {
>  		step_active_slots();
> -- snap --
>
> That's quite ugly, though. And what's worse, it is pretty unreadable, too.

Unfortunately that sort of thing is a logic error as clang, ICC and
probably others are on a mission to make __GNUC__ as useless as
possible:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/38499462/how-to-tell-clang-to-stop-pretending-to-be-other-compilers

I think it *might* work in practice though, my local clang claims to be
gcc 4, so maybe everyone faking it stops at a low enough version?

But did you spot 9c539d1027d (config.mak.dev: alternative workaround to
gcc 12 warning in http.c, 2022-04-15)? We already disable this file-wide
in config.mak.dev, but I didn't check if the Windows code was using that
(or if you were targeting those without DEVELOPER=1).

We could move that to thake main Makefile, but then we'd have to call
detect-compiler there. I have some local patches to do something like
that if there's interest (rather, to bootstrap compilation by compiling
a C object and getting the macro values, instead of relying on that
shellscript).

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-24 21:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-24  0:23 [PATCH 0/4] ci: fix windows-build with GCC v12.x Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-05-24  0:23 ` [PATCH 1/4] compat/win32/syslog: fix use-after-realloc Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-05-24 12:39   ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-05-24 20:58     ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-24  0:23 ` [PATCH 2/4] nedmalloc: avoid new compile error Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-05-24  8:00   ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-05-24 15:59     ` René Scharfe
2022-05-24 20:46       ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-05-24 21:33         ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-05-24  0:23 ` [PATCH 3/4] http.c: avoid danging pointer to local variable `finished` Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-05-24  7:58   ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-05-24 20:06     ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-24 21:15       ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-05-24 21:45         ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [this message]
2022-05-24 22:38         ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-25 10:16           ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-05-25 12:48             ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-05-24  0:23 ` [PATCH 4/4] dir.c: avoid "exceeds maximum object size" error with GCC v12.x Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2022-05-24  5:53   ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-05-24 21:05     ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-05-25 13:39       ` Derrick Stolee
2022-05-25 18:27         ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-24 15:54 ` [PATCH 0/4] ci: fix windows-build " Jeff Hostetler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=220524.865yluvby1.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com \
    --to=avarab@gmail.com \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).