From: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
To: Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, stolee@gmail.com, gitster@pobox.com,
zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com, jonathantanmy@google.com,
Jeff Hostetler <git@jeffhostetler.com>,
Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/12] bundle: safely handle --objects option
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2022 10:37:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <220308.86h788ydm6.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19694d5b255227f2314456118c2c7fc986ae52a0.1646689840.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
On Mon, Mar 07 2022, Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget wrote:
> From: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
>
> Since 'git bundle' uses setup_revisions() to specify the object walk,
> some options do not make sense to include during the pack-objects child
> process. Further, these options are used for a call to
> traverse_commit_list() which would then require a callback which is
> currently NULL.
>
> By populating the callback we prevent a segfault in the case of adding
> the --objects flag. This is really a redundant statement because the
> command is constructing a pack-file containing all objects in the
> discovered commit range.
>
> Adding --objects to a 'git bundle' command might cause a slower command,
> but at least it will not have a hard failure when the user supplies this
> option. We can also disable walking trees and blobs in advance of this
> walk.
>
> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
> ---
> bundle.c | 10 +++++++++-
> t/t6020-bundle-misc.sh | 12 ++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/bundle.c b/bundle.c
> index a0bb687b0f4..dc56db9a50a 100644
> --- a/bundle.c
> +++ b/bundle.c
> @@ -451,6 +451,12 @@ struct bundle_prerequisites_info {
> int fd;
> };
>
> +
> +static void ignore_object(struct object *obj, const char *v, void *data)
> +{
> + /* Do nothing. */
> +}
> +
> static void write_bundle_prerequisites(struct commit *commit, void *data)
> {
> struct bundle_prerequisites_info *bpi = data;
> @@ -544,7 +550,9 @@ int create_bundle(struct repository *r, const char *path,
> die("revision walk setup failed");
> bpi.fd = bundle_fd;
> bpi.pending = &revs_copy.pending;
> - traverse_commit_list(&revs, write_bundle_prerequisites, NULL, &bpi);
> +
> + revs.blob_objects = revs.tree_objects = 0;
> + traverse_commit_list(&revs, write_bundle_prerequisites, ignore_object, &bpi);
> object_array_remove_duplicates(&revs_copy.pending);
>
> /* write bundle refs */
> diff --git a/t/t6020-bundle-misc.sh b/t/t6020-bundle-misc.sh
> index b13e8a52a93..6522401617d 100755
> --- a/t/t6020-bundle-misc.sh
> +++ b/t/t6020-bundle-misc.sh
> @@ -475,4 +475,16 @@ test_expect_success 'clone from bundle' '
> test_cmp expect actual
> '
>
> +test_expect_success 'unfiltered bundle with --objects' '
> + git bundle create all-objects.bdl \
> + --all --objects &&
> + git bundle create all.bdl \
> + --all &&
> +
> + # Compare the headers of these files.
> + head -11 all.bdl >expect &&
> + head -11 all-objects.bdl >actual &&
> + test_cmp expect actual
> +'
> +
> test_done
Re this comment on v1: https://lore.kernel.org/git/220307.86fsntzsda.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com/
This series also passes your tests with this on top:
diff --git a/bundle.c b/bundle.c
index 3846108f7a6..1f022f53336 100644
--- a/bundle.c
+++ b/bundle.c
@@ -468,11 +468,6 @@ struct bundle_prerequisites_info {
};
-static void ignore_object(struct object *obj, const char *v, void *data)
-{
- /* Do nothing. */
-}
-
static void write_bundle_prerequisites(struct commit *commit, void *data)
{
struct bundle_prerequisites_info *bpi = data;
@@ -598,7 +593,7 @@ int create_bundle(struct repository *r, const char *path,
*/
revs.filter = NULL;
revs.blob_objects = revs.tree_objects = 0;
- traverse_commit_list(&revs, write_bundle_prerequisites, ignore_object, &bpi);
+ traverse_commit_list(&revs, write_bundle_prerequisites, NULL, &bpi);
object_array_remove_duplicates(&revs_copy.pending);
/* write bundle refs */
diff --git a/list-objects.c b/list-objects.c
index 9422625b39e..d44a1db2262 100644
--- a/list-objects.c
+++ b/list-objects.c
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ static void process_tag(struct traversal_context *ctx,
ctx->filter);
if (r & LOFR_MARK_SEEN)
tag->object.flags |= SEEN;
- if (r & LOFR_DO_SHOW)
+ if (r & LOFR_DO_SHOW && ctx->show_object)
ctx->show_object(&tag->object, name, ctx->show_data);
}
Aside from whether that's a good idea, doesn't that at least point to
missing test coverage here, see traverse_non_commits() and other paths
in list-objects.c that'll call ctx->show_object().
I think an actually sensible patch for this is the below, i.e. the API
is conflating "do show" with "should we show AND we have a callback?":
diff --git a/bundle.c b/bundle.c
index 3846108f7a6..1f022f53336 100644
--- a/bundle.c
+++ b/bundle.c
@@ -468,11 +468,6 @@ struct bundle_prerequisites_info {
};
-static void ignore_object(struct object *obj, const char *v, void *data)
-{
- /* Do nothing. */
-}
-
static void write_bundle_prerequisites(struct commit *commit, void *data)
{
struct bundle_prerequisites_info *bpi = data;
@@ -598,7 +593,7 @@ int create_bundle(struct repository *r, const char *path,
*/
revs.filter = NULL;
revs.blob_objects = revs.tree_objects = 0;
- traverse_commit_list(&revs, write_bundle_prerequisites, ignore_object, &bpi);
+ traverse_commit_list(&revs, write_bundle_prerequisites, NULL, &bpi);
object_array_remove_duplicates(&revs_copy.pending);
/* write bundle refs */
diff --git a/list-objects.c b/list-objects.c
index 9422625b39e..1725cb252a9 100644
--- a/list-objects.c
+++ b/list-objects.c
@@ -21,6 +21,22 @@ struct traversal_context {
struct filter *filter;
};
+static void show_commit(struct traversal_context *ctx, struct commit *commit,
+ void *data)
+{
+ if (!ctx->show_commit)
+ return;
+ ctx->show_commit(commit, data);
+}
+
+static void show_object(struct traversal_context *ctx, struct object *object,
+ const char *path, void *data)
+{
+ if (!ctx->show_object)
+ return;
+ ctx->show_object(object, path, data);
+}
+
static void process_blob(struct traversal_context *ctx,
struct blob *blob,
struct strbuf *path,
@@ -60,7 +76,7 @@ static void process_blob(struct traversal_context *ctx,
if (r & LOFR_MARK_SEEN)
obj->flags |= SEEN;
if (r & LOFR_DO_SHOW)
- ctx->show_object(obj, path->buf, ctx->show_data);
+ show_object(ctx, obj, path->buf, ctx->show_data);
strbuf_setlen(path, pathlen);
}
@@ -194,7 +210,7 @@ static void process_tree(struct traversal_context *ctx,
if (r & LOFR_MARK_SEEN)
obj->flags |= SEEN;
if (r & LOFR_DO_SHOW)
- ctx->show_object(obj, base->buf, ctx->show_data);
+ show_object(ctx, obj, base->buf, ctx->show_data);
if (base->len)
strbuf_addch(base, '/');
@@ -210,7 +226,7 @@ static void process_tree(struct traversal_context *ctx,
if (r & LOFR_MARK_SEEN)
obj->flags |= SEEN;
if (r & LOFR_DO_SHOW)
- ctx->show_object(obj, base->buf, ctx->show_data);
+ show_object(ctx, obj, base->buf, ctx->show_data);
strbuf_setlen(base, baselen);
free_tree_buffer(tree);
@@ -228,7 +244,7 @@ static void process_tag(struct traversal_context *ctx,
if (r & LOFR_MARK_SEEN)
tag->object.flags |= SEEN;
if (r & LOFR_DO_SHOW)
- ctx->show_object(&tag->object, name, ctx->show_data);
+ show_object(ctx, &tag->object, name, ctx->show_data);
}
static void mark_edge_parents_uninteresting(struct commit *commit,
@@ -402,7 +418,7 @@ static void do_traverse(struct traversal_context *ctx)
if (r & LOFR_MARK_SEEN)
commit->object.flags |= SEEN;
if (r & LOFR_DO_SHOW)
- ctx->show_commit(commit, ctx->show_data);
+ show_commit(ctx, commit, ctx->show_data);
if (ctx->revs->tree_blobs_in_commit_order)
/*
I think that'll do what you want, and also seems to set us up for safer
API use going forward, i.e. we have a couple of NULL-passing callers
already.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-08 9:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 114+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-23 17:55 [PATCH 00/11] Partial bundles Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-02-23 17:55 ` [PATCH 01/11] index-pack: document and test the --promisor option Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-02-23 17:55 ` [PATCH 02/11] revision: put object filter into struct rev_info Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-04 22:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-07 13:59 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-03-07 16:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-02-23 17:55 ` [PATCH 03/11] pack-objects: use rev.filter when possible Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-04 22:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-02-23 17:55 ` [PATCH 04/11] pack-bitmap: drop filter in prepare_bitmap_walk() Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-04 22:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-02-23 17:55 ` [PATCH 05/11] list-objects: consolidate traverse_commit_list[_filtered] Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-04 22:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-02-23 17:55 ` [PATCH 06/11] MyFirstObjectWalk: update recommended usage Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-04 22:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-07 14:05 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-03-07 16:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-02-23 17:55 ` [PATCH 07/11] bundle: safely handle --objects option Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-02-28 16:00 ` Jeff Hostetler
2022-03-04 22:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-07 14:09 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-03-04 22:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-07 15:35 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-02-23 17:55 ` [PATCH 08/11] bundle: parse filter capability Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-07 15:38 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-07 16:14 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-03-07 16:22 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-07 16:29 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-03-07 15:55 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-02-23 17:55 ` [PATCH 09/11] rev-list: move --filter parsing into revision.c Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-02-23 17:55 ` [PATCH 10/11] bundle: create filtered bundles Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-04 23:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-07 14:14 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-03-07 16:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-07 15:44 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-02-23 17:55 ` [PATCH 11/11] bundle: unbundle promisor packs Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-04 23:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-07 14:48 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-03-07 16:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-07 18:57 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-03-07 19:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-07 19:49 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-03-07 19:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-07 20:20 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-03-07 21:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-07 15:47 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-07 16:10 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-02-28 17:00 ` [PATCH 00/11] Partial bundles Jeff Hostetler
2022-02-28 17:54 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-03-01 18:03 ` Jeff Hostetler
2022-03-04 19:19 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-03-07 14:55 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-07 14:59 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-03-07 21:50 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-07 21:50 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] index-pack: document and test the --promisor option Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-07 21:50 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] revision: put object filter into struct rev_info Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-07 21:50 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] pack-objects: use rev.filter when possible Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-07 21:50 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] pack-bitmap: drop filter in prepare_bitmap_walk() Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-07 21:50 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] list-objects: consolidate traverse_commit_list[_filtered] Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-07 21:50 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] MyFirstObjectWalk: update recommended usage Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-07 21:50 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] bundle: safely handle --objects option Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-08 9:37 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [this message]
2022-03-08 13:45 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-03-08 13:53 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-07 21:50 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] bundle: parse filter capability Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-08 9:25 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-08 13:43 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-03-07 21:50 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] rev-list: move --filter parsing into revision.c Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-07 21:50 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] bundle: create filtered bundles Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-07 21:50 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] bundle: unbundle promisor packs Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-07 21:50 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] clone: fail gracefully when cloning filtered bundle Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-07 22:11 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] Partial bundles Junio C Hamano
2022-03-08 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-08 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] index-pack: document and test the --promisor option Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-08 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] revision: put object filter into struct rev_info Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-08 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] pack-objects: use rev.filter when possible Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-08 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] pack-bitmap: drop filter in prepare_bitmap_walk() Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-08 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] list-objects: consolidate traverse_commit_list[_filtered] Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-09 13:24 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-08 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] MyFirstObjectWalk: update recommended usage Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-08 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] list-objects: handle NULL function pointers Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason via GitGitGadget
2022-03-08 17:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-09 13:40 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-09 14:16 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-03-09 18:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-08 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] bundle: parse filter capability Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-08 17:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-09 14:35 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-03-09 13:30 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-08 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] rev-list: move --filter parsing into revision.c Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-08 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] bundle: create filtered bundles Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-08 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] bundle: unbundle promisor packs Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-08 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] clone: fail gracefully when cloning filtered bundle Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-08 16:10 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-03-08 17:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-09 16:01 ` [PATCH v4 00/13] Partial bundles Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-09 16:01 ` [PATCH v4 01/13] index-pack: document and test the --promisor option Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-09 16:01 ` [PATCH v4 02/13] list-objects-filter-options: create copy helper Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-09 16:01 ` [PATCH v4 03/13] revision: put object filter into struct rev_info Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-09 18:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-09 16:01 ` [PATCH v4 04/13] pack-objects: use rev.filter when possible Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-10 13:11 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-10 13:33 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-03-10 14:24 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-09 16:01 ` [PATCH v4 05/13] pack-bitmap: drop filter in prepare_bitmap_walk() Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-09 16:01 ` [PATCH v4 06/13] list-objects: consolidate traverse_commit_list[_filtered] Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-09 16:01 ` [PATCH v4 07/13] MyFirstObjectWalk: update recommended usage Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-09 16:01 ` [PATCH v4 08/13] list-objects: handle NULL function pointers Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason via GitGitGadget
2022-03-09 16:01 ` [PATCH v4 09/13] bundle: parse filter capability Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-09 18:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-09 18:55 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-03-09 16:01 ` [PATCH v4 10/13] rev-list: move --filter parsing into revision.c Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-09 16:01 ` [PATCH v4 11/13] bundle: create filtered bundles Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-09 16:01 ` [PATCH v4 12/13] bundle: unbundle promisor packs Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-03-09 16:01 ` [PATCH v4 13/13] clone: fail gracefully when cloning filtered bundle Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=220308.86h788ydm6.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com \
--to=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=derrickstolee@github.com \
--cc=git@jeffhostetler.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jonathantanmy@google.com \
--cc=stolee@gmail.com \
--cc=zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).