From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 989E71F953 for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 03:59:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230171AbhKJEC1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Nov 2021 23:02:27 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41176 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229963AbhKJEC0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Nov 2021 23:02:26 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-x52a.google.com (mail-ed1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83A4BC061764 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 19:59:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ed1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id c8so4905300ede.13 for ; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 19:59:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:references:user-agent:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version; bh=RD6DMZfXjHEJ/LJUBYg/X7wL3Ktge5Qyok3wukiP+YE=; b=eM1XlMayPZwgRyph4HU6b9Muj4LN9c125qFeanu0ZACC7ZGDlI5xwQbAWzUdu8Ezj+ 1cMA8QGM8H4Ryqq4TrJRWcyUt1Oib7JHTBt9yjFHsUIV7K9VTogutkEaMOKztW1S8QBH OoKJVTJcs9ZYcahzAGxIsO0Ngkz+R2D+V8Am5HS0YQ7PpPMdSPde0RIDHnPRT7uoeMde jpIhmcLXclV9Jm4eaavmYwt1JlXEyKZ7USO7GhGsAPQruvpEtKV7t2WI415LzwOdKJFJ ScFsL+vEZ7XHmlKIKOQ9K3Ev7fQNtCRRjkxGWy197/BzfkpicA+IK0h+qMkVWFApnYgN aqOg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:references:user-agent :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version; bh=RD6DMZfXjHEJ/LJUBYg/X7wL3Ktge5Qyok3wukiP+YE=; b=tR505Ik8ohid4tkrQ7nss2DSj12MK35z8CJldpVI1BngfxYHSWjW0kc3kImy/FinBi bE2NJ1m3Le2kGCDXAkILSa7TaW5aZvoRer55Myj9H8RNVxWQcEzP16r+g7B7UxEgt6WJ uA3LHsXqNDkYjb2hvCtfRPN4Yl4VUKAKeSeitqPC3mbteaRipQ8oCjULBXD7QwM99NiI 00I/FlWh3XsuSZohYFyIzTYwSFfOrLdrR25euH/q6WLgyarkIuygaxPdZpGTiFtMBgaW mPlVT7KP+s5gVUEnppt2H02+FL+E8jalrmM9qAwYnDbgt2eIPDzJIKiwJRjRHYZ6vp2J w6Jg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530drtivm60Q466VNBgpqoKz78H6jzTWdAwFnVyaGPWEvaDX0tcr qE0276n2zD/HWX/svod0qHs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxXeA0KHnInjl4EvHpPmWvdwnSz+2PG6vCcxjXb/LqvGaG6emiZoqeo2b198kcJpf+YbCvzOw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:c0c:: with SMTP id ga12mr17771645ejc.417.1636516777998; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 19:59:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from gmgdl (j120189.upc-j.chello.nl. [24.132.120.189]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id da7sm3722557edb.82.2021.11.09.19.59.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 09 Nov 2021 19:59:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from avar by gmgdl with local (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1mkels-000nLE-Qj; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 04:59:36 +0100 From: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason To: Anders Kaseorg Cc: Junio C Hamano , Johannes Schindelin , Jeff King , git@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Heiduk Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] receive-pack: Clean dead code from update_worktree() Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 04:57:40 +0100 References: <2f983e36-532f-ac87-9ade-fba4c6b9d276@mit.edu> <20211109230941.2518143-1-andersk@mit.edu> <20211109230941.2518143-2-andersk@mit.edu> User-agent: Debian GNU/Linux bookworm/sid; Emacs 27.1; mu4e 1.6.9 In-reply-to: <20211109230941.2518143-2-andersk@mit.edu> Message-ID: <211110.86y25wirtj.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 09 2021, Anders Kaseorg wrote: > + if (!worktree || !worktree->path) > + BUG("worktree->path must be non-NULL"); Perhaps a metter of taste, but I think BUG() should really be used for things that need a custom message over and beyond what assert() gives us. In this case using BUG() gives you a worse message, if you do: assert(worktree && worktree->path) You'll get a sensible message from any modern compiler quotign the variable etc, all of which says the same thing as that BUG() message, just with less verbosity.