From: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] reftable/stack: return stack segments directly
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 15:22:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251031-562-add-sub-command-to-check-if-maintenance-is-needed-v1-1-a03d53e28d0e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251031-562-add-sub-command-to-check-if-maintenance-is-needed-v1-0-a03d53e28d0e@gmail.com>
The `stack_table_sizes_for_compaction()` function returns individual
sizes of each reftable table. This function is only called by
`reftable_stack_auto_compact()` to decide which tables need to be
compacted, if any.
Modify the function to directly return the segments, which avoids the
extra step of receiving the sizes only to pass it to
`suggest_compaction_segment()`.
A future commit will also add functionality for checking whether
auto-compaction is necessary without performing it. This change allows
code re-usability in that context.
Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
---
reftable/stack.c | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/reftable/stack.c b/reftable/stack.c
index 65d89820bd..49387f9344 100644
--- a/reftable/stack.c
+++ b/reftable/stack.c
@@ -1626,7 +1626,8 @@ struct segment suggest_compaction_segment(uint64_t *sizes, size_t n,
return seg;
}
-static uint64_t *stack_table_sizes_for_compaction(struct reftable_stack *st)
+static int stack_segments_for_compaction(struct reftable_stack *st,
+ struct segment *seg)
{
int version = (st->opts.hash_id == REFTABLE_HASH_SHA1) ? 1 : 2;
int overhead = header_size(version) - 1;
@@ -1634,29 +1635,29 @@ static uint64_t *stack_table_sizes_for_compaction(struct reftable_stack *st)
REFTABLE_CALLOC_ARRAY(sizes, st->merged->tables_len);
if (!sizes)
- return NULL;
+ return REFTABLE_OUT_OF_MEMORY_ERROR;
for (size_t i = 0; i < st->merged->tables_len; i++)
sizes[i] = st->tables[i]->size - overhead;
- return sizes;
+ *seg = suggest_compaction_segment(sizes, st->merged->tables_len,
+ st->opts.auto_compaction_factor);
+ reftable_free(sizes);
+
+ return 0;
}
int reftable_stack_auto_compact(struct reftable_stack *st)
{
struct segment seg;
- uint64_t *sizes;
+ int err;
if (st->merged->tables_len < 2)
return 0;
- sizes = stack_table_sizes_for_compaction(st);
- if (!sizes)
- return REFTABLE_OUT_OF_MEMORY_ERROR;
-
- seg = suggest_compaction_segment(sizes, st->merged->tables_len,
- st->opts.auto_compaction_factor);
- reftable_free(sizes);
+ err = stack_segments_for_compaction(st, &seg);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
if (segment_size(&seg) > 0)
return stack_compact_range(st, seg.start, seg.end - 1,
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-31 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-31 14:22 [PATCH 0/5] maintenance: add an 'is-needed' subcommand Karthik Nayak
2025-10-31 14:22 ` Karthik Nayak [this message]
2025-10-31 16:22 ` [PATCH 1/5] reftable/stack: return stack segments directly Justin Tobler
2025-11-03 15:05 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-03 18:03 ` Justin Tobler
2025-10-31 14:22 ` [PATCH 2/5] reftable/stack: add function to check if optimization is required Karthik Nayak
2025-10-31 17:02 ` Justin Tobler
2025-10-31 18:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-03 16:20 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-03 15:51 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-03 17:59 ` Justin Tobler
2025-11-03 14:00 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-11-03 16:35 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-10-31 14:22 ` [PATCH 3/5] refs: add a `optimize_required` field to `struct ref_storage_be` Karthik Nayak
2025-10-31 14:22 ` [PATCH 4/5] maintenance: add checking logic in `pack_refs_condition()` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-03 14:00 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-11-03 17:04 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-10-31 14:22 ` [PATCH 5/5] maintenance: add 'is-needed' subcommand Karthik Nayak
2025-11-03 14:00 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-11-03 17:18 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-04 5:54 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-11-04 8:28 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-04 8:43 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] maintenance: add an " Karthik Nayak
2025-11-04 8:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] reftable/stack: return stack segments directly Karthik Nayak
2025-11-04 8:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] reftable/stack: add function to check if optimization is required Karthik Nayak
2025-11-04 20:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-05 14:11 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-05 18:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-06 8:18 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-04 8:43 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] refs: add a `optimize_required` field to `struct ref_storage_be` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-04 8:43 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] maintenance: add checking logic in `pack_refs_condition()` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-04 8:44 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] maintenance: add 'is-needed' subcommand Karthik Nayak
2025-11-04 15:43 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] maintenance: add an " Junio C Hamano
2025-11-05 14:00 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-06 8:22 ` [PATCH v3 " Karthik Nayak
2025-11-06 8:22 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] reftable/stack: return stack segments directly Karthik Nayak
2025-11-06 8:22 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] reftable/stack: add function to check if optimization is required Karthik Nayak
2025-11-06 18:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-07 6:06 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-11-06 8:22 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] refs: add a `optimize_required` field to `struct ref_storage_be` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-06 8:22 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] maintenance: add checking logic in `pack_refs_condition()` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-06 11:58 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-11-06 13:04 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-06 15:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-07 15:58 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-07 16:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-07 15:58 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-06 8:22 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] maintenance: add 'is-needed' subcommand Karthik Nayak
2025-11-06 12:02 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-11-06 13:07 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-08 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] maintenance: add an " Karthik Nayak
2025-11-08 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] reftable/stack: return stack segments directly Karthik Nayak
2025-11-08 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] reftable/stack: add function to check if optimization is required Karthik Nayak
2025-11-08 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] refs: add a `optimize_required` field to `struct ref_storage_be` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-08 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] maintenance: add checking logic in `pack_refs_condition()` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-08 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] maintenance: add 'is-needed' subcommand Karthik Nayak
2025-11-10 6:46 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] maintenance: add an " Patrick Steinhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251031-562-add-sub-command-to-check-if-maintenance-is-needed-v1-1-a03d53e28d0e@gmail.com \
--to=karthik.188@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).